Close Window
Aetna Aetna
Clinical Policy Bulletin:
Winged Scapular Surgery
Number: 0859


Policy

Aetna considers surgical treatment using a type of dynamic muscle transfer medically necessary for functional impairment related to winged scapula when symptoms do not resolve after 12 months (traumatic cause) to 24 months (non-traumatic cause) of conservative therapy. Surgical correction for a winged scapula resulting in a cosmetic deformity is considered cosmetic. 

Aetna considers neurolysis of the spinal accessory muscle for the treatment of winged scapula experimental and investigational because there is inadequate evidence in the peer-reviewed published clinical literature regarding its effectiveness.



Background

The scapulae or shoulder blades are bony structures on the upper back that connect the upper arms to the thorax. Each scapula is surrounded by thick layers of  muscle that are responsible for the smooth movement of the shoulder joint. A winged scapula is characterized by protrusion of the medial border of the scapula from the thorax as the scapula rotates out and is caused by paralysis of the anterior serratus muscle. It is most commonly caused by damage or a contusion to the long thoracic nerve of the shoulder and/or weak-ness of the serratus anterior muscle as a result of blunt trauma to the shoulder, traction of the neck or sometimes from a viral illness. Scapular winging has be classified as either static or dynamic. Static winging is attributed to a fixed deformity of the shoulder girdle, spine or ribs and is present when the patient’s arms are at their sides. Dynamic winging is attributed to a neuromuscular disorder and is produced by active or resisted movement and usually not observed at rest. Scapular winging has also been classified anatomically based on whether the etiology of the causative lesion is related to nerve, muscle, bone or joint disease. Scapular winging is the result of neuropraxic injuries in most patients with symptoms spontaneously resolving within 6 to 9 months after traumatic injury and within 2 years after nontraumatic injuries. Conservative treatment of at least 12 to 24 months has been advocated consisting of pain control, immobili-zation, and rehabilitation. Localized injections are not routinely used for isolated scapular winging. A cosmetic deformity may occur in the upper back as the result of winged scapular.

Surgical treatment using a type of dynamic muscle transfer may be indicated for functional impairment related to winged scapula when symptoms do not resolve after 12 months (traumatic cause) to 24 months (non-traumatic cause) of conservative therapy.

Surgical treatment is divided into two categories:

  • Static stabilization procedures involve scapulothoracic fusion and scapulothoracic arthrodesis in which the scapula is fused to the thorax. These procedures may be effective in cases of generalized weakness (e.g., facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy) when the patient has disabling pain and functional loss and no transferable muscles. They can relieve shoulder fatigue and pain and allow functional abduction and flexion of the upper extremity. Static stabilization procedures have fallen out of favor for scapular winging related to isolated muscle weakness because the results deteriorate over time with recurrence of winging. The usual incidence of complications associated with some of these procedures is high.
  • Dynamic muscle transfer procedures have shown better results for correction of scapular winging and restoration of function. Several different muscles have been used in various muscle transfer techniques to provide dynamic control of the scapula and to improve scapulothoracic and glenohumeral motion. Transfer of the sternal head of the pectoralis major muscle to the inferior angle of the scapula with fascia lata autograft reinforcement is the preferred method of treatment for scapular winging related to long thoracic nerve injury.The surgical procedure of choice for scapular winging related to chronic trapezius muscle dysfunction involves the lateral transfer of the insertions of the levator scapulae and the rhomboid major and minor muscles. This procedure enables the muscles to support the shoulder girdle and to stabilize the scapula.

Surgical procedures for the treatment of winged scapula include:

  • Scapulothoracic arthrodesis (fusion)
  • Scapulopexy (surgical fixation of the scapula to the chest wall or to the spinous process of the vertebrae)
  • Nerve transfer to the serratus anterior muscle
  • Eden-Lange procedure or modified Eden-Lange procedure (transfer of the levator scapulae to the acromion and the rhomboid muscles to the infraspinatus fossa). 

Surgical correction for a winged scapula resulting in a cosmetic deformity only would be considered not medically necessary.

Neurolysis is the destruction of nerves to promote analgesia or pain relief. The spinal accessory nerve is the eleventh cranial nerve. It emerges from the skull and receives an extra root (or accessory) from the upper part of the spinal cord. This nerve supplies the sternocleidomastoid and trapezius muscles. The sternocleidomastoid muscle is in the front of the neck and turns the head while the trapezius muscle moves the scapula, turns the head to the opposite side, and helps pull the head back. Neurolysis of the spinal accessory muscle for the treatment of winged scapula is investigational/experimental because there is inadequate evidence in the peer-reviewed published clinical literature regarding its effectiveness.

 
CPT Codes / HCPCS Codes / ICD-9 Codes
CPT codes covered if selection criteria are met:
23395
23397
23400
ICD-9 codes covered if selection criteria are met:
736.89 Other acquired deformity of other parts of limb [winged scapula]


The above policy is based on the following references:
  1. DeLee: DeLee and Drez's Orthopaedic Sports Medicine. Third Edition. 2009.
  2. Diab M et al. Scapulothoracic fusion for facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 87(10): 2267-75  2005.
  3. Duralde XA et al. Evaluation and treatment of the winged scapula. J South Orthop Assoc, 4(1): 38-52 1995.
  4. Fiddian NJ; King RJ. The winged scapula. Clin Orthop Relat Res, (185): 228-36  1984.
  5. Frontera: Essentials of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Second Edition. 2008.
  6. Galano GJ. Surgical treatment of winged scapula. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 466(3): 652-60  2008.
  7. Giannini S et al. Fixation of winged scapula in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Clin Med Res, 5(3): 155-62  2007.
  8. Glenn RE; Romeo AA. Scapulothoracic arthrodesis: Indications and surgical technique. Techniques in Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 6(3):178–187  2005.
  9. Jeon IH et al. Scapulothoracic fusion for painful winging of the scapula in nondystrophic patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 14(4): 400-6   2005.
  10. Krishnan SG et al. Scapulothoracic arthrodesis: indications, technique, and results. Clin Orthop Relat Res, (435): 126-33   2005.
  11. Martin RM et al. Scapular winging: anatomical review, diagnosis, and treatments. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med, 1(1): 1-11   2008.
  12. Pahys JM et al. Scapular stabilization in patients with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med, 32(4): 389-97 2009.
  13. Rhee YG, Ha YJ. Long-term results of scapulothoracic arthrodesis of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 15(4): 445-50  2006.
  14. Uerpairojkit C et al. Nerve transfer to serratus anterior muscle using the thoracodorsal nerve for winged scapula in C5 and C6 brachial plexus root avulsions. J Hand Surg Am, 34(1): 74-8  2009.
  15. Warner JJ et al. Serratus anterior dysfunction. Recognition and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res, (349): 139-48  1998.
  16. Wiater JM; Flatow EL. Long thoracic nerve injury. Clin Orthop Relat Res, (368): 17-27  1999.
  17. Wiater JM; Bigliani LU. Spinal accessory nerve injury. Clin Orthop Relat Res, (368): 5-16  1999.
  18. Ziaee MA et al. Scapulothoracic arthrodesis for winged scapula due to facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (a new technique). Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), 35(7): 311-5  2006.


email this page   


Copyright Aetna Inc. All rights reserved. Clinical Policy Bulletins are developed by Aetna to assist in administering plan benefits and constitute neither offers of coverage nor medical advice. This Clinical Policy Bulletin contains only a partial, general description of plan or program benefits and does not constitute a contract. Aetna does not provide health care services and, therefore, cannot guarantee any results or outcomes. Participating providers are independent contractors in private practice and are neither employees nor agents of Aetna or its affiliates. Treating providers are solely responsible for medical advice and treatment of members. This Clinical Policy Bulletin may be updated and therefore is subject to change.
Aetna
Back to top