Aetna considers pemetrexed disodium (Alimta) medically necessary for the treatment of the following:
Aetna considers pemetrexed experimental and investigational for the treatment of the following types of cancers (not an all inclusive list) since its effectiveness for other malignancies has not been established:
Note: Physician administration of vitamin B-12 injections is considered medically necessary for individuals receiving pemetrexed (see CBP 536 - Vitamin B-12 Therapy).Background
Guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2013) recommend the use of pemetrexed for the following indications:
Bladder Cancer, Upper GU Tract Tumors, and Urothelial Carcinoma of the Prostate - May be considered as second-line therapy as a single agent for metastatic disease
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma - Induction therapy in combination with cisplatin for medically operable clinical stage I-III disease
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma - Used as a single agent or in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin as
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma - Second-line treatment as a single agent
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) - Preoperative concurrent chemoradiation in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin for
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer - Used in combination with cisplatin as
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer - Initial treatment as definitive concurrent chemoradiation in combination with carboplatin or cisplatin for
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer - Adjuvant chemotherapy in combination with cisplatin
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer - First-line therapy for recurrence or metastasis for tumors of nonsquamous cell histology
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer - Therapy for recurrence or metastasis in patients with performance status 0-2 with tumors of nonsquamous cell histology who achieve tumor response or stable disease following first-line chemotherapy as
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer - Therapy for recurrence or metastasis in patients with performance status 0-2 with tumors of nonsquamous cell histology who achieve tumor response or stable disease following first-line chemotherapy as
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer/Fallopian Tube Cancer/Primary Peritoneal Cancer – Single agent therapy for persistent disease or recurrence.
Thymomas and Thymic Carcinomas - Second-line therapy as a single agent following radiation therapy for locally advanced unresectable disease.
Mesothelioma refers to cancer of the mesothelium, a membrane that covers and protects most of the internal organs of the body. Mesothelioma is rare; approximately 2,000 new cases are diagnosed each year. Malignant mesothelioma is an aggressive malignancy that may be caused by environmental carcinogens (e.g., asbestos and erionite), viruses (SV40), and genetic predisposition. Malignant pleural mesothelioma is far more common than the peritoneal variants; it is a rapidly progressing malignancy with a median survival time of 6 to 9 months.
Most patients with mesothelioma are not candidates for radiation therapy or surgical treatment, and cytotoxic agents are the only options. Historically, no classes or combinations of cytotoxic agents consistently yielded response rates over 20 %. Recently, pemetrexed, a new multi-targeted anti-folate that inhibits several enzymes involved in the folate pathway, has been reported to exhibit broad anti-tumor activity in clinical trials in various solid tumors, including mesothelioma, non-small cell lung, breast, cervical, colorectal, head and neck, and bladder cancers. In particular, pemetrexed in combination with platinum compounds, have produced response rates of up to 45 %. Pemetrexed is a potent inhibitor of thymidylate synthase, dihydrofolate reductase, and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase.
In a phase III clinical trial, Vogelzang et al (2003) examined whether treatment with pemetrexed and cisplatin results in better survival time than treatment with cisplatin alone. Chemotherapy-naive patients who were ineligible for curative surgery were randomly assigned to receive pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day-1, or cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day-1. Both regimens were given intravenously every 21 days. A total of 456 patients were assigned: 226 received pemetrexed and cisplatin, 222 received cisplatin alone, and 8 never received therapy. Median survival time in the pemetrexed/cisplatin arm was 12.1 months versus 9.3 months in the control arm. Median time to progression was significantly longer in the pemetrexed/cisplatin arm: 5.7 months versus 3.9 months. Response rates were 41.3 % in the pemetrexed/cisplatin arm versus 16.7 % in the control arm. After 117 patients had enrolled, folic acid and vitamin B12 were added to reduce toxicity, resulting in a significant reduction in toxicities in the group treated with the pemetrexed/cisplatin combination. The authors concluded that treatment with pemetrexed plus cisplatin and vitamin supplementation resulted in superior survival time, time to progression, and response rates compared with treatment with cisplatin alone in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Addition of folic acid and vitamin B12 significantly reduced toxicity without adversely affecting survival time.
Pemetrexed disodium (Alimta) was approved by the FDA on February 5, 2004. It is the first drug approved for mesothelioma. The recommended dose of Alimta is 500 mg/m2 administered as an intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Patients must take daily doses of folic acid and vitamin B-12 to reduce the severity of side effects such as low white blood cell count, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, rash, and diarrhea.
The FDA-approved labeling of Alimta has the following recommendations for dosing and administration in mesothelioma:
Non-small cell lung cancer
Pemetrexed has also demonstrated clinical activity in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In a randomized, controlled study (n = 571), Hanna et al (2004) compared the effectiveness and toxicity of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC previously treated with chemotherapy. Eligible patients had a performance status 0 to 2, previous treatment with one prior chemotherapy regimen for advanced NSCLC, and adequate organ function. Patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/ m2 intravenously day 1 with vitamin B12, folic acid, and dexamethasone or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 intravenously day 1 with dexamethasone every 21 days. The primary end point was overall survival. Overall response rates were 9.1 % and 8.8 % for pemetrexed and docetaxel, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 2.9 months for each arm, and median survival time was 8.3 versus 7.9 months (p = not significant) for pemetrexed and docetaxel, respectively. The 1-year survival rate for each arm was 29.7 %. Patients receiving docetaxel were more likely to have grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (40.2 % versus 5.3 %; p < 0.001), febrile neutropenia (12.7 % versus 1.9 %; p < 0.001), neutropenia with infections (3.3 % versus 0.0 %; p = 0.004), hospitalizations for neutropenic fever (13.4 % versus 1.5 %; p < 0.001), hospitalizations due to other drug related adverse events (10.5 % versus 6.4 %; p = 0.092), use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support (19.2 % versus 2.6 %, p <. 0001) and all grade alopecia (37.7 % versus 6.4 %; p < 0.001) compared with patients receiving pemetrexed. The authors concluded that treatment with pemetrexed resulted in clinically equivalent efficacy outcomes, but with significantly fewer side effects compared with docetaxel in the second-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC and should be considered a standard treatment option for second-line NSCLC when available.
On August 20, 2004, the FDA approved Alimta (pemetrexed for injection) for the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients who have undergone chemotherapy. In October 2008, FDA-approved indications for Alimta were expanded to include use in combination with cisplatin, in the first-line treatment of locally-advanced and metastatic NSCLC, for patients with nonsquamous histology. According to available guidelines, pemetrexed is indicated for persons who have histological or cytological confirmation of NSCLC with stage III or IV disease not amenable to curative therapy, and who have had prior chemotherapy for advanced disease. According to these guidelines, candidates for pemetrexed should have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0 to 2, and have adequate bone marrow, renal and hepatic function.
The approval of Alimta in first-line advanced NSCLC for nonsquamous cell histology was based on a phase III, open-label randomized study (1,725 patients) that evaluated pemetrexed plus cisplatin (AC arm) versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC arm) (Eli Lilly, 2008). The median survival was 10.3 months in the AC arm and 10.3 months in the GC arm [adjusted hazard ratio 0.94 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.84 to 1.05)] (Scagliotti et al, 2008). The median progression-free survival was 4.8 and 5.1 months for the AC and GC arms, respectively [adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.04 (95 % CI: 0.94 to 1.15)]. The overall response rates were 27.1% and 24.7% for the AC and GC arms, respectively. The investigators reported that, in a pre-specified analysis, the impact of NSCLC histology on overall survival was examined. Clinically relevant differences in survival according to histology were observed. In the nonsquamous cell NSCLC subgroup, the median survival was 11.0 and 10.1 months in the AC and GC groups, respectively [unadjusted HR 0.84 (95 % CI: 0.74 to 0.96)]. However, in the squamous cell histology subgroup, the median survival was 9.4 versus 10.8 months in the AC and GC groups, respectively [unadjusted HR1.22 (95 % CI: 0.99 to 1.50)]. The investigators reported that this unfavorable effect on overall survival associated with squamous cell histology observed with pemetrexed was also noted in a retrospective analysis of the single-agent trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with stage III/IV NSCLC after prior chemotherapy (citing Peterson et al, 2007).
In a phase II study, Patel and colleagues (2009) evaluated the safety and effectiveness of pemetrexed, carboplatin, and bevacizumab followed by maintenance pemetrexed and bevacizumab in patients with chemotherapy-naive stage IIIB (effusion) or stage IV non-squamous NSCLC. Patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2), carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve of 6, and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. For patients with response or stable disease, pemetrexed and bevacizumab were continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. A total of 50 patients were enrolled and received treatment. The median follow-up was 13.0 months, and the median number of treatment cycles was 7 (range of 1 to 51). Thirty patients (60 %) completed greater than or equal to 6 treatment cycles, and 9 (18 %) completed greater than or equal to 18 treatment cycles. Among the 49 patients assessable for response, the objective response rate was 55 % (95 % CI: 41 % to 69 %). Median progression-free and overall survival rates were 7.8 months (95 % CI: 5.2 to 11.5 months) and 14.1 months (95 % CI: 10.8 to 19.6 months), respectively. The authors concluded that this regimen, involving a maintenance component, was associated with acceptable toxicity and relatively long survival in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC. These results justify a phase III comparison against the standard-of-care in this patient population.
Mok and Ramalingam (2009) noted that systemic chemotherapy with platinum-based regimens provides modest improvements in survival and quality of life for patients with advanced-stage NSCLC. Extended first-line chemotherapy with combination regimens for more than 4 to 6 cycles is not recommended because of cumulative toxicities and lack of proven advantage in survival with the increased duration of therapy. The early use of an anti-cancer agent as maintenance therapy after disease stabilization or maximal response with platinum-based regimens is, therefore, being recognized as a new treatment paradigm in NSCLC. Maintenance therapy can extend first-line treatment and provide an acceptable balance between efficacy and toxicity. The essential prerequisites for maintenance therapy include good tolerability, ability to administer extended cycles of therapy without cumulative toxicity, and an increase in the duration of progression-free survival (PFS). Pemetrexed has recently been shown to improve the median PFS in the maintenance setting.
On July 2, 2009, the FDA approved pemetrexed as maintenance therapy of patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous NSCLC whose disease has not progressed after 4 cycles of platinum-based first-line chemotherapy. The FDA approval was based on a double-blind study of maintenance pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care. The study was designed to show superior PFS and overall survival (OS) of pemetrexed over placebo. The FDA-specified primary study objective was OS. Pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) was given as an intravenous infusion over 10 mins on day 1 of each 21‑day cycle until disease progression. Folic acid, vitamin B12, and a corticosteroid were also given to all patients to reduce pemetrexed toxicity. There were 663 randomized patients (pemetrexed arm = 441 patients; placebo arm = 222 patients). Treatments were well-balanced with respect to the baseline disease characteristics and randomization factors. The majority of patients had ECOG Performance Status (PS) of 1 (60.2 %) and stage IV disease (80.8 %). Adenocarcinoma (49.6 %) was the predominant histologic subtype, followed by squamous cell histology (27.3 %).
The median OS for intent-to-treat (ITT) patients was 13.4 months for patients receiving pemetrexed and 10.6 months for those receiving placebo [HR of 0.79 (95 % CI: 0.65 to 0.95, p = 0.012)]. Median OS was 15.5 months versus 10.3 months for patients with non-squamous histologies receiving pemetrexed and placebo, respectively [HR of 0.70 (95 % CI: 0.56 to 0.88)]. The median OS in patients with squamous histology receiving pemetrexed was 9.9 months versus 10.8 months for those receiving placebo [HR of 1.07 (95 % CI: 0.77 to 1.50)]. A significant improvement in PFS for the ITT patient population receiving pemetrexed maintenance therapy compared to placebo was observed. The median PFS was 4.0 months for the pemetrexed-treated patients compared to 2.0 months for patients in the placebo arm [HR of 0.60 (95 % CI: 0.49 to 0.73, p < 0.00001)]. A treatment-by-histology interaction was also observed for PFS. The PFS for patients with non-squamous histologies receiving pemetrexed versus placebo was 4.4 months and 1.8 months, respectively [HR of 0.47 (95 % CI: 0.37 to 0.60)]. The PFS for pemetrexed therapy in patients with squamous cell histology was 2.4 months versus 2.5 months for placebo treatment [HR of 1.03 (95 % CI: 0.71 to 1.49)].
The safety results for patients treated with pemetrexed are consistent with the known safety profile of single-agent pemetrexed previously described in product labeling. The most common (greater than 5 %) adverse reactions in patients receiving pemetrexed were hematologic toxicity, increase in hepatic enzymes, fatigue, gastrointestinal toxicity, sensory neuropathy and skin rash.
The FDA-approved labeling of Alimta has the following recommendations for dosing and administration in NSCLC:
Thymoma and Thymic Carcinoma
Guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN, 2008) recommend pemetrexed or docetaxel as a second-line agent for thymoma or thymic carcinoma, in persons who have experienced disease progression either during of after first-line agents. The guidelines note that pemetrexed has been shown to be equivalent to docetaxel with less toxicity. NCCN guidelines list 6 combination chemotherapy regimens as first-line agents for thymic malignancies.
In a multi-center, phase II clinical trial, Miller and colleagues (2008) estimated the anti-tumor activity of pemetrexed in patients with advanced or recurrent carcinoma of the cervix that failed on higher priority treatment protocols and determined the nature and degree of toxicity. Pemetrexed at a dose of 900 mg/m(2) was administered as an intravenous infusion over a 10-min period every 21 days. A total of 29 patients were enrolled in this study. Two patients did not receive treatment and thus were inevaluable. A total of 128 cycles were administered with 37 % of patients receiving 6 or more cycles. The treatment was well-tolerated. More serious toxicities (grade 3 and 4) included anemia in 41 %, leukopenia in 30 %, neutropenia in 26 %, and infection in 26 %. No treatment related deaths were reported. Four patients (15 %) had partial responses with a median response duration of 4.4 months. The response rate for non-radiated or radiated disease sites was 25 % and 7 % respectively. A total of 16 patients (59 %) had stable disease and 7 (26 %) had increasing disease. Median PFS was 3.1 months and OS was 7.4 months. The authors concluded that pemetrexed at this dose and schedule showed moderate activity against advanced or recurrent cervical cancer that has failed prior chemotherapy. Data from other tumor sites has suggested synergy between pemetrexed and cisplatin and should be considered for further study.
Guidelines from the NCCN (2009) recommends the use of pemetrexed as a single agent for persons with recurrent ovarian cancer who are resistant to platinum-based chemotherapy. This recommendation was based upon clinical trial evidence that pemetrexed was active in ovarian cancer (Miller et al, 2009).
Small Cell Lung Cancer
In a phase III clinical trial, Socinski et al (2009) compared pemetrexed-carboplatin with etoposide-carboplatin for the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Chemotherapy-naive patients with ES-SCLC and an ECOG performance status of zero to 2 were randomly assigned to receive (i) pemetrexed-carboplatin (pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) on day 1; carboplatin at area under the serum concentration-time curve [AUC] 5 on day 1) or (ii) etoposide-carboplatin (etoposide 100 mg/m(2) on days 1 through 3; carboplatin AUC 5 on day 1) every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles. The primary objective of the study was non-inferiority of pemetrexed-carboplatin overall survival with a 15 % margin. Accrual was terminated with 908 of 1,820 patients enrolled after results of a planned interim analysis. In the final analysis, pemetrexed-carboplatin was inferior to etoposide-carboplatin for OS (median, 8.1 versus 10.6 months; HR,1.56; 95 % CI: 1.27 to 1.92; log-rank p < 0.01) and PFS (median, 3.8 versus 5.4 months; HR, 1.85; 95 % CI: 1.58 to 2.17; log-rank p < 0.01). Objective response rates were also significantly lower for pemetrexed-carboplatin (31 % versus 52 %; p < 0.001). Pemetrexed-carboplatin had lower grade 3 to 4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and leukopenia than etoposide-carboplatin; grade 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia was comparable between arms and anemia was higher in the pemetrexed-carboplatin arm. The authors concluded that pemetrexed-carboplatin is inferior for the treatment of ES-SCLC. Planned translational research and pharmacogenomic analyses of tumor and blood samples may help explain the study results and provide insight into new treatment strategies.
In an open-labe phase II study, Che et al (2010) attempted to confirm the efficacy and to assess the tolerability of a pemetrexed plus carboplatin combination in previously untreated patients with ES-SCLC. Subjects received pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) and carboplatin (ACU of 5) every 21 days for a maximum 6 cycles. The primary end point for this trial was the confirmed response rate and the accrual goal was 70 patients. A total 46 eligible patients (29 aged less than 70 years, 17 aged greater than or equal to 70 years) were accrued to this study. The efficacy outcomes were similar between the 2 age groups. Overall, the confirmed response rate was 35 % (16 of 46; 95 % CI: 21 % to 50 %), where all 16 were partial responses. These results provided strong evidence that the study would not meet the preset efficacy criteria and thus this study closed before full accrual. The median duration of response was 4.4 months (95 % CI: 2.9 to 5.2). Median OS for patients aged less than 70 years and aged greater than or equal to 70 years was 9.2 months (95 % CI: 5.4 to 11.6) and 10.8 months (95 % CI: 2.2 to14.3), respectively. Grade 3 or higher toxicity rates were similar between the younger and older patients. Grade 3/4 and grade 4 hematological toxicities were observed in 46 % and 26 % of patients, respectively. The authors concluded that although well-tolerated, the combination of pemetrexed and carboplatin is not as effective as standard therapy in patients with untreated ES-SCLC.
Leukemia and Lymphoma
Norris and Adamson (2010) noted that renewed interest in antifols for the treatment of childhood cancers has resulted from identification of novel antifols with broad spectrums of anti-cancer activity and from re-evaluation of the original clinical antifol, aminopterin. In this pre-clinical study, these researchers evaluated the in-vitro activity of both traditional antifols (e.g., methotrexate, aminopterin) and novel antifols (e.g., pemetrexed, talotrexin) in childhood acute leukemias and lymphomas. These researchers compared the in-vitro cytotoxicity of methotrexate, aminopterin, pemetrexed, and talotrexin in a panel of 6 pediatric leukemia and lymphoma cell lines using the sulforhodamine B assay. In addition to defining a 50 % growth inhibitory concentration (IC50) for a 120-hr drug exposure, these researchers contrasted the activity of the drugs in the context of clinically achievable (tolerable) drug exposures using the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). They defined each agent's clinical potency index (CPI) as the AUC achieved with standard pediatric dosing regimens divided by the in-vitro IC50. Across all cell lines, talotrexin (median IC50 7 nM) and aminopterin (median IC50 17 nM) had lower IC50's than methotrexate (median IC50 78 nM) and pemetrexed (median IC50 155 nM). However, the CPI for methotrexate (median 0.9) was significantly greater than that for aminopterin (median 0.4). In contrast, pemetrexed had a significantly better CPI (median 13) than the traditional antifols. The authors concluded that aminopterin does not appear to offer any advantage over methotrexate for the treatment of childhood ALL. They stated that further study of pemetrexed in childhood leukemias is warranted.
In a phase I study, Abdel-Karim and colleagues (2011) examined the toxicity profile, activity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of pemetrexed in leukemia. Patients with refractory or relapsed acute leukemia were eligible. Pemetrexed was infused intravenously over 25 mins with vitamin B-12 supplementation. Courses were repeated every 3 to 4 weeks according to toxicity and efficacy. The starting dose of 900 mg/m2 was escalated by approximately 33 % until the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was determined. A total of 20 patients with acute myeloid (AML) or lymphocytic (ALL) leukemia received therapy. The main non-hematologic adverse event was liver dysfunction at several dose levels, including 2 DLTs at 3,600 mg/m2. One patient with ALL (3,600 mg/m2 dose level) achieved a partial response. Pemetrexed pharmacokinetics were linear with escalated dosing. Elevated plasma deoxyuridine was observed in a subset of patients following pemetrexed infusion, but was not correlated with dose levels. Changes in the nucleotide pools of circulating mononuclear cells were observed, but were variable. The authors concluded that recommended phase II dose of pemetrexed for future leukemia studies is intravenous 2,700 mg/m2 over 25 mins every 3 to 4 weeks with vitamin B-12 supplementation. Deoxyuridine levels did not increase with increasing pemetrexed dose, suggesting pemetrexed inhibition of thymidylate synthase (TS) may be saturated by the 900 mg/m2 dose level. However, no firm conclusion can be made regarding TS saturation in tumor cells. While tolerable, pemetrexed monotherapy had limited activity in this highly refractory population. These researchers noted that exploration of pemetrexed in combination with other active agents in leukemia is a reasonable future endeavor.
Raizer et al (2012) evaluated the anti-tumor activity and safety of pemetrexed in recurrent primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). Patients with relapsed/refractory PCNSL were enrolled in this trial. Treatment consisted of pemetrexed 900 mg/m(2) given every 3 weeks with low-dose dexamethasone, folate, and B12 supplementation. Each cycle was 6 weeks, and follow-up imaging was done before each new cycle. Treatment was continued until complete remission, progression, or toxicity. A total of 11 patients were treated, with a median age of 69.8 years and Karnofsky performance status of 70 %; 10 of 11 patients had failed prior high-dose methotrexate. The median number of pemetrexed cycles given was 5, with an associated overall response rate of 55 % and disease control rate of 91 %. The 6-month PFS was 45 %, median PFS was 5.7 months, and median OS was 10.1 months. Toxicities were primarily hematologic and infectious. The authors concluded that pemetrexed has single-agent activity in relapsed/refractory PCNSL. Toxicities were seen likely because of the higher than standard dose used. They stated that further investigation of this agent or other multi-targeted anti-folates in PCNSL is warranted to determine optimal dose and efficacy in a more homogeneous population.
In a phase II clinical study, Thodtmann et al (2003) evaluated the effects of pemetrexed (multi-targeted anti-folate, Alimta) for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Patients were required to have histological diagnosis of metastatic RCC with measurable disease and no prior chemotherapy. In addition, patients were required to have a World Health Organization (WHO) performance status of 0 to 2 and adequate bone marrow reserve. Patients received pemetrexed at a dose of 600 mg/m2 as a 10-min infusion every 3 weeks. Patients did not receive folic acid or vitamin B12 supplementation. A total of 39 patients were enrolled and 32 were evaluable for response. Three patients had a partial response for a response rate of 9 % (95 % confidence interval (CI): 2 to 25 %). The median time to progressive disease was 10.5 months. Of the non-responders, 22 had stable disease (median duration was 5.8 months; range of 1.5 to 27.7) and 7 had progressive disease (median time to progression was 5.4 months). Median time to progression for all qualified patients was 5.7 months. Common toxicities experienced were diarrhea and infection. Fatigue, stomatitis, and rash were also reported. The most common hematologic toxicity was grade 3/4 lymphopenia in 76 % of patients. Leukopenia, granulocytopenia, and thrombocytopenia were also frequently reported. The authors concluded that single-agent pemetrexed has moderate activity in the treatment of metastatic RCC and should be investigated in combination with other potential active agents, as first-line treatment.
Dasanu et al (2012) stated that many of the risk factors and pathogenesis of urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis are similar to the ones of the more common urothelial bladder cancer. In addition, 2 endemic nephropathies and 2 inherited syndromes have been linked with the development of upper urologic cancer. Multiple synchronous or metachronous lesions throughout urinary tract are rather common and should always be sought in the management of this entity. Surgical resection is the treatment of choice in early-stage tumors. The role of adjuvant radiation and chemo-radiation for carcinoma of the renal pelvis remains to be redefined, given the advent of conformal approaches and intensity modulation. In non-surgical candidates, chemotherapy remains the mainstay. Metastatic urothelial renal pelvic cancer is usually treated with combination platinum-based chemotherapy. Definitive radiation therapy should be considered in persons with locally advanced/unresectable disease, multiple comorbidities, and/or severely compromised performance status. Recently, the anti-folate agent pemetrexed has demonstrated an overall response rate of circa 30 % in urothelial carcinoma. New targeted agents, alone or in combination with cytotoxic drugs, are currently being tested in clinical trials and may lead to new and exciting avenues for the therapy of this disease.
UpToDate reviews on "Overview of the treatment of renal cell carcinoma" (Atkins, 2015), and “Treatment protocols for renal cell cancer” (Brenner et al, 2015) do not mention the use of pemetrexed as a therapeutic option.
Furthermore, the NCCN clinical practice guideline on "Kidney cancer" (Version 3.2015) does not mention the use of pemetrexed; and the 2015 NCCN's Drugs & Biologics Compendium does not list renal cell carcinoma as an indication of pemetrexed.
Head and Neck Cancer
In a phase II clinical trial, Vermorken et al (2013) evaluated pemetrexed with cisplatin and cetuximab in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Patients received cetuximab 250 mg/m2 (loading dose: 400 mg/m2) days 1, 8 and 15; pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 + cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1, q3w up to 6 cycles and folic acid, vitamin B12 and prophylactic medications. After a minimum of 4 cycles, responding patients were eligible for maintenance with pemetrexed and cetuximab, or either as monotherapy, until progression or toxicity. Efficacy (primary end-point: PFS) and toxicity were evaluated. A total of 66 patients received greater than or equal to 1 cycle of the triplet. Most patients were male (80.3 %), with a median age of 62 years and ECOG performance status of 1 (71.2 %). Diagnoses included oropharynx (45.5 %) and larynx (24.2 %) cancers, with loco-regional disease (51.5 %) alone, or combined with distant metastases (48.5 %). Median (m) PFS was 4.4 months (95 % CI: 3.6 to 5.4); median OS was 9.7 months (95 % CI: 6.5 to 13.1). Objective response rate was 29.3 %; 23 patients had stable disease (39.7 %). Drug-related grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (33.3 %), fatigue (24.2 %), anorexia (12.1 %) and infection (10.6 %). Five treatment-related deaths (7.6 %) occurred. The authors concluded that efficacy results were consistent with current standard treatment for this patient population, but the pre-specified mPFS of 5.5 months was not achieved. Grade 3/4 toxicities were also consistent with standard treatment, although treatment-related deaths were higher than expected.
UpToDate reviews on ‘” (Brockstein et al, 2015a), “Treatment of locoregionally advanced (stage III and IV) head and neck cancer: The larynx and hypopharynx” (Brockstein et al, 2015b), and “Treatment of locoregionally advanced (stage III and IV) head and neck cancer: The oropharynx” (Worden et al, 2015) do not mention pemetrexed as a therapeutic option.
Also, an UpToDate review on “Treatment of metastatic and recurrent head and neck cancer” (Brockstein and Vokes, 2015) states that “Cisplatin plus pemetrexed -- Although the combination of cisplatin plus pemetrexed may have activity in some patient subsets, this regimen is not recommended for the initial treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer”.
Furthermore, the NCCN clinical practice guideline on "Head and neck cancers" (Version 1.2015) does not mention the use of pemetrexed; and the 2015 NCCN's Drugs & Biologics Compendium does not list head and neck cancers as an indication of pemetrexed.
|CPT Codes / HCPCS Codes / ICD-10 Codes|
|Information in the [brackets] below has been added for clarification purposes.  Codes requiring a 7th character are represented by "+":|
|ICD-10 codes will become effective as of October 1, 2015:|
|Other CPT codes related to the CPB:|
|96365, 96366, 96367, 96368,
96379, 96409, 96411, 96413,
96415, 96416, 96417
|IV fusion therapy|
|HCPCS codes covered if selection criteria are met:|
|J9305||Injection, pemetrexed, 10 mg|
|ICD-10 codes covered if selection criteria are met:|
|For Mesothelioma (malignant) - see Neoplasm, by site, malignant|
|C33 - C34.92||Malignant neoplasm of trachea, bronchus and lung [non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) only- not small cell lung cancer]|
|C37||Malignant neoplasm of thymus [thymic carcinoma]|
|C38.4||Malignant neoplasm of pleura|
|C45.0||Mesothelioma of pleura|
|C45.1||Mesothelioma of peritoneum [persistent or recurrent]|
|C53.0 - C53.9||Malignant neoplasm of corpus uteri|
|C56.1 - C57.02||Malignant neoplasm of ovary or fallopian tube [persistent or recurrent]|
|C61||Malignant neoplasm of prostate|
|C66.1 - C66.9||Malignant neoplasm of ureter|
|C67.0 - C67.9||Malignant neoplasm of bladder|
|C68.0||Malignant neoplasm of urethra|
|ICD-10 codes not covered for indications listed in the CPB (not all-inclusive):|
|C01 - C02.9||Malignant neoplasm of tongue [squamous cell carcinoma]|
|C15.3 - C15.9||Malignant neoplasm of esophagus|
|C16.0 - C16.9||Malignant neoplasm of stomach [gastric]|
|C18.0 - C20||Malignant neoplasm of colon, rectosigmoid junction, and rectum [colorectal]|
|C25.0 - C25.9||Malignant neoplasm of pancreas|
|C44.121 - C44.129, C44.221 - C44.229, C44.320 - C44.329, C44.42||Squamous cell carcinoma of skin|
|C64.9||Malignant neoplasm of unspecified kidney, except renal pelvis [renal cell carcinoma]|
|C50.011 - C50.929||Malignant neoplasm of breast|
|C58||Malignant neoplasm of placenta [choriocarcinoma]|
|C7A.010 - C7B.8||Neuroendocrine tumors|
|D03.0 - D03.9||Melanoma in situ|
|D3A.00 - D3A.8||Benign neuroendocrine tumors|
Pemetrexed for Mesothelioma:
Pemetrexed for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Thymic Malignancies:
Pemetrexed for Other Types of Cancer: