Close Window
Aetna.com Home    |     Help    |     Contact Us

Search  
Aetna Aetna
Clinical Policy Bulletin:
Cervical Traction Devices
Number: 0453


Policy

  1. Aetna considers pneumatic cervical traction devices for home use medically necessary durable medical equipment (DME) to alleviate pain caused by paravertebral muscle spasm when all of the following criteria are met: 

    1. The member has completed a 6-week course of physical therapy in the outpatient setting and still has pain; and
    2. The member has failed medical therapy (e.g., oral anti-inflammatory medications, muscle relaxants); and
    3. The doctor prescribes 20 pounds or more of home cervical traction; and
    4. Any one of the following criteria is met:

      1. The member failed a trial of over-the-door cervical traction;* or
      2. The member has temporomandibular joint disease which may become worse with over-the-door cervical traction; or
      3. The member has distortion of the neck or chin (e.g., radical neck dissection) making use of a chinstrap impractical, and

    5. The member has had a series of trials of this device in the outpatient setting before being sent home with one; and
    6. Home therapy is being supervised by a physical therapist

  2. Aetna considers pneumatic cervical traction devices experimental and investigational for all other indications.

* Over-the-door cervical traction is considered medically necessary DME for persons with chronic neck pain.

Note: A one-month rental is deemed medically necessary when the above medical necessity criteria are met.  Purchase may be considered medically necessary for persons whose symptoms have improved following a one-month trial.



Background

The prevalence of non-traumatic mechanical neck disorders (neck pain) in the United States is 10%.  The anatomic source may be myofascial, ligamentous, osseous, neurologic, cutaneous, or visceral.  Possible causes include: 1) compression of neural structures resulting in spasm and radiculopathy; 2) inflammatory, neoplastic, infectious, or degenerative processes; or 3) disruption of tissue secondary to trauma.  Acute phase treatment of neck pain in the physical therapy outpatient setting includes moist heat, gentle massage and temporary immobilization with a cervical collar that holds the neck in slight flexion.  Ultrasonic treatments, especially combined with low frequency current electrotherapy of the muscles may be helpful.  Therapies with low frequency pulsating electromagnetic field and laser photobiostimulation have also been proved successful.  Patients with cervical herniated nucleus pulposus and radiculopathy are usually treated with an aggressive physical rehabilitation program.  For chronic neck pain, no treatment is necessary except for non-narcotic analgesics for symptoms, and avoiding any type of activity or work, which causes strain of the neck.

For decades, cervical traction has been applied widely for pain relief of neck muscle spasm or nerve root compression.  It is a technique in which a force is applied to a part of the body to reduce paravertebral muscle spasms by stretching soft tissues, and in certain circumstances separating facet joint surfaces or bony structures.  Additional pounds for cervical traction is usually utilized in the hospitals or clinics for temporary use and in certain situations and under observation with occasional imaging, making sure of not to destabilize the spine.  Studies have shown that traction must be constant so that the muscles may tire and the strain falls on the joints.  It generally takes 2 minutes of sustained traction before the intervertebral spaces begin to widen.  Forces between 20 and 50 pounds are commonly used to achieve intervertebral separation.

Cervical traction is administered by various techniques ranging from supine mechanical motorized cervical traction to seated cervical traction using an over-the-door pulley support with attached weights.  Duration of cervical traction can range from a few minutes to 30 min, once or twice weekly to several times per day.  Anecdotal evidence suggests efficacy and safety, but there is no documentation of efficacy of cervical traction beyond short-term pain reduction.  In general, over-the-door traction at home is limited to providing less than 20 pounds of traction.

Pneumatic cervical traction devices (e.g., Hometrac, Pronex) were developed to deliver cervical traction in the home comparable to forces applied by physical therapists in the outpatient setting.  The patient is instructed in home traction to relieve symptoms, an exercise routine to relieve spasm and discomfort, and to report any weaknesses, eye symptoms, and bladder or bowel incontinence immediately. 

There are some who argue that pneumatic cervical traction should be offered as first line therapy in preference to over-the-door cervical traction, asserting that pneumatic cervical traction is superior to over-the-door cervical traction.  There are, however, no studies in the peer reviewed published medical literature comparing over-the-door cervical traction with pneumatic traction devices.  Although pneumatic devices are able to provide more force than over-the-door traction devices, there are no peer-reviewed published clinical studies proving that clinical outcomes are improved by applying greater traction force.  In addition, the potential adverse effects of the application of large amounts of cervical traction with pneumatic devices in the home setting have not been sufficiently evaluated in well-designed published clinical studies.  There is also no published peer-reviewed evidence proving that pneumatic traction devices result in less irritation, improved compliance, or improved outcomes compared to over-the-door traction.  For these reasons, the use of pneumatic cervical traction devices are reserved for persons with neck pain who have failed over-the-door cervical traction.  

No matter how clinically effective a therapy is found to be, the treatment process, especially when it is dependent upon home use, is highly dependent upon patient compliance.  So, these patients must undergo adequate follow-up to assure proper usage.

 
CPT Codes / HCPCS Codes / ICD-9 Codes
HCPCS codes covered if selection criteria are met:
E0849 Traction equipment, cervical, free-standing stand/frame, pneumatic, applying traction force to other than mandible
E0856 Cervical traction device, cervical collar with inflatable air bladder
Other HCPCS codes related to the CPB:
E0830 Ambulatory traction device, all types, each
E0840 Traction frame, attached to headboard, cervical traction
E0850 Traction stand, freestanding, cervical traction
E0855 Cervical traction equipment not requiring additional stand or frame
E0860 Traction equipment, overdoor, cervical
J0475 Injection baclofen, 10 mg
J0476 Injection, baclofen, 50 mcg for intrathecal trial
J1885 Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg
J2360 Injection, orphenadrine citrate, up to 60 mg
J2800 Injection, methocarbamol, up to 10 ml
J3360 Injection, diazepam, up to 5 mg
Other ICD-9 codes related to the CPB:
721.0 Cervical spondylosis without myelopathy
721.1 Cervical spondylosis with myelopathy
722.0 Displacement of cervical intervertebral disc without myelopathy
722.4 Degeneration of cervical intervertebral disc
722.71 Intervertebral disc disorder with myelopathy, cervical region
722.81 Postlaminectomy syndrome, cervical region
722.91 Other and unspecified disc disorder, cervical region
723.0 Spinal stenosis of cervical region
723.1 Cervicalgia
723.2 Cervicocranial syndrome
723.3 Cervicobrachial syndrome (diffuse)
723.4 Brachial neuritis or radiculitis NOS
723.8 Other syndromes affecting cervical region
724.5 Backache, unspecified
724.8 Other symptoms referable to back
728.85 Spasm of muscle
839.00 - 839.18 Dislocation cervical vertebra
847.0 Sprain and strain of neck


The above policy is based on the following references:
  1. Colachis SC Jr, Strohm BR. Cervical traction: Relationship of traction time to varied tractive force with constant angle of pull. Archiv Phys Med Rehabil. 1965;46(12):815-819.
  2. Deets D, Hands KL, Hopp SS. Cervical traction: A comparison of sitting and supine positions. Phys Therapy. 1977;57(3):255-261.
  3. Ellenberg MR, Honet JC, Treanor WJ. Cervical radiculopathy. Archiv Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:342-352.
  4. Frankel VH, Shore NA, Hoppenfeld S. Stress distribution in cervical traction: Prevention of temporomandibular joint pain syndrome: A case report. Clinic Orthoped. 1964;32:114-115.
  5. Franks A. Temporomandibular joint dysfunction associated with cervical traction. Ann Phys Med. 1967;8:38-40.
  6. Geiringer SR, Kincaid CB, Rechtien JR. Traction, manipulation, and massage. In: Rehabilitation Medicine: Principles and Practice. 2nd ed. JA DeLisa, ed. Philadelphia, PA: J.B. Lippincott Co.; 1993:440-444.
  7. Glacier Cross, Inc. Patient Satisfaction Survey. Kalispell, MT: Glacier Cross; 1997.
  8. Glacier Cross, Inc. What Healthcare Professionals Say About Pronex. Kalispell, MT: Glacier Cross; October 1995.
  9. Harris PR. Cervical traction: Review of literature and treatment guidelines. Phys Ther. 1997;57(8):910-914.
  10. Lawson A. Pronex Cervical Traction Device: Application and Effectiveness. Kalispell, MT: Glacier Cross; October 1995.
  11. Olson VL. Case report: Chronic whiplash associated disorder treated with home cervical traction. J Back Musculoskel Rehab. 1997;9:181-190.
  12. Saunders HD. Introduction: Efficacy of traction for back and neck pain. Phys Ther Perspect. 1997;117(5):53-54.
  13. Sauders Group, Inc. Saunders Cervical Hometrac®: A Guide for Clinicians and Third Party Payers. Chaska, MN: The Saunders Group, Inc.; July 1998.
  14. Shore N, Frankel V, Hoppenfeld S. Cervical traction and temporomandibular joint dysfunction. J Am Dent Assoc. 1964;68(1):4-6.
  15. van Der Heijden GJ, Beurskens AJ, Koes BW, et al. The efficacy of traction for back and neck pain: A systematic, blinded review of randomized clinical trial methods. Phys Ther. 1995;75(2):93-104.
  16. Aker PD, Gross AR, Goldsmith CH, et al. Conservative management of mechanical neck pain: Systematic overview and meta-analysis. Br Med J. 1996;313:1291-1296.
  17. Venditti PP, Rosner AL, Kettner N, et al. Cervical traction device study: A basic evaluation of home-use supine cervical traction devices. JNMS: J Neuromusc System. 1995;3(2):82-91.
  18. Moeti P, Marchetti G. Clinical outcome from mechanical intermittent cervical traction for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy: A case series. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2001;31(4):207-213.
  19. Gross AR, Aker PD, Goldsmith CH, et al. Physical medicine modalities for mechanical neck disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 1998;(1):CD000961. 
  20. Boskovic K. Physical therapy of subjective symptoms of the cervical syndrome. Med Pregl. 1999;52(11-12):495-500.
  21. Swezey RL, Swezey AM, Warner K. Efficacy of home cervical traction therapy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;78(1):30-32.
  22. McCarthy L. Safe handling of patients on cervical traction. Nurs Times. 1998;94(14):57-59.
  23. Nakamura K, Kurokawa T, Hoshino Y, et al. Conservative treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Achievement and sustainability of a level of 'no disability'. J Spinal Disord. 1998;11(2):175-179.
  24. Shterenshis MV. The history of modern spinal traction with particular reference to neural disorders. Spinal Cord. 1997;35(3):139-146.
  25. Wong AM, Lee MY, Chang WH, et al. Clinical trial of a cervical traction modality with electromyographic biofeedback. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;76(1):19-25.
  26. Saal JS, Saal JA, Yurth EF. Nonoperative management of herniated cervical intervertebral disc with radiculopathy. Spine. 1996;21(16):1877-1883.
  27. Hoving JL, Gross AR, Gasner D, et al. A critical appraisal of review articles on the effectiveness of conservative treatment for neck pain. Spine. 2001;26(2):196-205.
  28. Carlsson J, Jonsson T, Norlander S, et al. Evidence-based physiotherapy in patients with neck pain. SBU Report No. 101. Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU); 1999.
  29. Nachemson A, Carlsson C-A, Englund L, et al. Back and neck pain: An evidence-based review. Summary and Conclusions. SBU Report No. 145. Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU); 2000.
  30. Kjellman GV, Skargren EI, Oberg BE. A critical analysis of randomised clinical trials on neck pain and treatment efficacy: A review of the literature. Scand J Rehab Med. 1999;31(3):139-152.
  31. Philadelphia Panel. Philadelphia Panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on selected rehabilitation interventions for neck pain. Physical Therapy. 2001;81(10):1701-1717.
  32. Washington State Department of Labor and Industries, Office of the Medical Director. Pronex and Hometrac cervical traction. Technology Assessment. Olympia, WA: Washington State Department of Labor and Industries; August 5, 2002. Available at: http://www.lni.wa.gov/omd/TechAssessDocs.htm. Accessed August 7, 2003.
  33. Verhagen AP, Scholten-Peeters GGM, van Wijngaarden S, et al. Conservative treatments for whiplash. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(2):CD003338.
  34. Bronfort G, Nilsson N, Haas M, et al. Non-invasive physical treatments for chronic/recurrent headache. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(3):CD001878.
  35. Graham N, Gross AR, Goldsmith C; the Cervical Overview Group. Mechanical traction for mechanical neck disorders: A systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2006;38(3):145-152.
  36. Vaughn HT, Having KM, Rogers JL. Radiographic analysis of intervertebral separation with a 0 degrees and 30 degrees rope angle using the Saunders cervical traction device. Spine. 2006;31(2):E39-E43.
  37. Binder A. Neck pain. In: BMJ Clinical Evidence. London, UK: BMJ Publishing Group; 2006.
  38. Graham N, Gross A, Goldsmith C, Klaber Moffett J. Mechanical traction for mechanical neck disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(1):CD006408.
  39. Borenstein DG. Chronic neck pain: How to approach treatment. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2007;11(6):436-439.


email this page   


Copyright Aetna Inc. All rights reserved. Clinical Policy Bulletins are developed by Aetna to assist in administering plan benefits and constitute neither offers of coverage nor medical advice. This Clinical Policy Bulletin contains only a partial, general description of plan or program benefits and does not constitute a contract. Aetna does not provide health care services and, therefore, cannot guarantee any results or outcomes. Participating providers are independent contractors in private practice and are neither employees nor agents of Aetna or its affiliates. Treating providers are solely responsible for medical advice and treatment of members. This Clinical Policy Bulletin may be updated and therefore is subject to change.
Aetna
Back to top