Close Window
Aetna Aetna
Clinical Policy Bulletin:
Erectile Dysfunction
Number: 0007


Policy

Aetna considers the diagnosis and treatment of erectile dysfunction (impotence) medically necessary according to the criteria outlined below.

  1. Diagnosis

    Aetna considers the following diagnostic workup of erectile dysfunction medically necessary:

    • Comprehensive history and physical examination (including medical and sexual history and psychosocial evaluation)
    • Duplexscan (Doppler and ultrasound) in conjunction with intracorporeal papaverine
    • Dynamic infusion cavernosometry and cavernosography only for members who are to undergo re-vascularization procedures and meet medical necessity criteria for penile re-vascularization (see below)
    • Pharmacological response test for erectile dysfunction (using vasoactive drugs, e.g., papaverine HCl, phentolamine mesylate, prostaglandin E1)
    • Pudendal arteriography (angiography) only for members who are to undergo penile re-vascularization and meet the medical necessity criteria for penile revascularization (see below).

    Aetna considers the following laboratory tests medically necessary for the diagnosis of erectile dysfunction:

    • Biothesiometry (Note: biothesiometry is considered an integral part of the comprehensive history and physical examination)
    • Blood glucose
    • Complete blood count
    • Creatinine
    • Hepatic panel
    • Lipid profile
    • Prostate specific antigen
    • Serum testosterone
       
      • Tests for evaluation of pituitary dysfunction (e.g., measurement of luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and prolactin levels) if serum testosterone level is below normal

    • Thyroid function studies
    • Urinalysis.

    Note: Routine nocturnal penile tumescence (NPT) and/or rigidity testing has no proven value.  Nocturnal penile tumescence testing using the postage stamp test or the snap gauge test is rarely medically necessary; it is considered medically necessary where clinical evaluation, including history and physical examination, is unable to distinguish psychogenic from organic impotence and any identified medical factors have been corrected.  Nocturnal penile tumescence testing using the RigiScan is considered medically necessary only where NPT testing is indicated, and the results of postage stamp or snap gauge testing are equivocal or inconclusive.

    Aetna considers the following workup/laboratory tests for the diagnosis of erectile dysfunction experimental and investigational because their effectiveness has not been established:

    • Angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism testing (for determining erectile dysfunction susceptibility)
    • Cavermap cavernous nerves electrical stimulation with penile plethysmography (also referred to as cavernosal nerve mapping).  This policy is based upon an assessment by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS, 2006)
    • Corpora cavernosal electromyography
    • Dorsal nerve conduction latencies
    • Evoked potential measurements (including stimulus evoked response for measurement of bulbocavernosus reflex latency)
    • Iron binding capacity
    • Penile plethysmography
    • Prostatic acid phosphatase
       
  2. Treatments

    Aetna considers the following therapies for the treatment of erectile dysfunction medically necessary:

    1. Injectable Medications

      Aetna considers self-administered injectable medications for the treatment of erectile dysfunction medically necessary.*  Medically necessary self-administered medications for erectile dysfunction include:

      1. Injections into the corpus cavernosa to cause an erection (papaverine, alprostadil, phentolamine) and,
      2. Medicated Urethral System for Erection (MUSE) method of treatment for erectile dysfunction that involves inserting medication through a small catheter into the urethra.

      Titrating doses of injectable impotence medications that are administered in a physician's office and the accompanying office visits are considered medically necessary.  This includes in office titrating doses of papaverine, alprostadil (prostaglandin E1 or Caverject) and phentolamine.  Except for phentolamine, which is not generally used alone, these drugs can be used alone or in combination.  The drug MUSE, a pellet from of alprostadil, is also used as an alternative to alprostadil injections.

      Diagnostic injections of impotence medications by the treating physician are also considered medically necessary.

      *Note: Coverage of injectable medications is subject to the terms of the member’s benefit plan.  Please check benefit plan descriptions for details.

    2. Oral and Transdermal Medications

      Aetna considers exogenous testosterone replacement therapy, including transdermal preparations, experimental and investigational for the treatment of non-hypogonadal impotence because its effectiveness in non-hypogonadal impotence has not been established.  (See CPB 0345 - Implantable Hormone Pellets.)

      Aetna considers topical cream or gel containing vasodilators, such as verapamil cream, experimental and investigational for the treatment of erectile dysfunction because their effectiveness for this indication has not been established.

      Note: Many Aetna pharmacy benefit plans exclude coverage of drugs for lifestyle enhancement or performance.  Please check benefit plan descriptions for details.  Under these plans, sildenafil citrate (Viagra), vardenafil hydrochloride (Levitra) and tadalafil (Cialis) are covered only when required by state regulation or when a plan sponsor has elected an optional rider under the pharmacy plan, or, for indemnity or PPO plans without a separate pharmacy benefit, when the plan sponsor has added optional coverage under the medical plan. 

    3. External Devices

      Aetna considers the external penile vacuum pump device medically necessary durable medical equipment (DME) when it is prescribed by a physician as an alternative to other therapies for erectile dysfunction.  External penile pumps are considered experimental and investigational for other indications including for the prevention of erectile dysfunction following prostatectomy because their effectiveness for these indications has not been established.

    4. Implantable Devices

      Aetna considers implantation of semi-rigid penile prostheses or inflatable penile prostheses (implantable penile pumps) medically necessary for members with documented physiologic erectile dysfunction who have failed medical therapy or for whom medical therapy is contraindicated.  Implantable penile prostheses are considered experimental and investigational for other indications because their effectiveness for indications other than the one listed above has not been established.

    5. Surgical Re-Vascularization

      Aetna considers penile re-vascularization for vasculogenic erectile dysfunction medically necessary only in men less than 55 years old who meet all of the following criteria:

      1. A focal blockage of arterial inflow is demonstrated by duplex Doppler ultrasonography or arteriography; and 
      2. Diagnostic work-up reveals normal corporeal venous function; and 
      3. Member is not actively smoking; and 
      4. Member is not diabetic and has no evidence of systemic vascular occlusive disease; and 
      5. The erectile dysfunction is the direct result of an arterial injury caused by blunt trauma to the pelvis and/or perineum.

      Penile re-vascularization is considered experimental and investigational for other indications because its effectiveness for indications other than the one listed above has not been established.  Consistent with clinical guidelines of the American Urological Association, Aetna considers arterial reconstructive procedures, dorsal vein arterialization procedures, or penile venous occlusive surgery (e.g., venous ligation, dorsal vein ligation) in men with erectile dysfunction secondary to arteriosclerotic occlusive disease experimental and investigational because such procedures have not been proven to be effective.

    6. Experimental and Investigational Treatments

      Aetna considers the following treatments experimental and investigational for erectile dysfunction because their effectiveness has not been established:

      1. Acupuncture
      2. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT)
      3. Percutaneous electrostimulation of the perineum
      4. Stem cell therapy (including adipose-derived stem cells).
         
    7. Peyronie's Disease

      1. Plaque Excisions and Venous Graft Patching

        Aetna considers surgical correction of Peyronie’s disease (e.g., plaque excisions and venous graft patching, tunica plication, Nesbit tuck procedure) medically necessary for the treatment of members with Peyronie's disease for 12 or more months with significant morbidity who have failed conservative medical treatment.  Surgical correction of Peyronie's disease is considered experimental and investigational when criteria are not met.

      2. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy

        Aetna considers ESWT experimental and investigational for Peyronie’s disease because of a lack of evidence from prospective randomized controlled clinical studies of the effectiveness of ESWT for this indication. 

      3. Interferon Alpha

        For interferon alpha for Peyronie’s disease, see CPB 0404 - Interferons.

      4. Verapamil Iontophoresis or Verapamil Intra-Lesional Injection

        Aetna considers iontophoresis or intra-lesional injection of verapamil experimental and investigational for Peyronie’s disease because of a lack of evidence from prospective randomized controlled clinical studies of the effectiveness of this approach for this indication.

      5. Testosterone Injection

        Aetna considers testosterone injection experimental and investigational for Peyronie’s disease because of a lack of evidence from prospective randomized controlled clinical studies of the effectiveness of this approach for this indication.

      6. Xiaflex

        Aetna considers Xiaflex (collagenase Clostridium histolyticum) for the treatment of Peyronie’s disease medically necessary when it is administered under the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) program.  (Note: A treatment course for Peyronie’s disease consists of a maximum of 4 treatment cycles (each separated by 6 weeks).  Each treatment cycle consists of 2 Xiaflex injection procedures (in which Xiaflex is injected directly into the collagen-containing structure of the penis) and 1 penile modeling procedure).  Also see CPB 0800 - Dupuytren's Contracture: Treatments.



Background

This policy is supported by guidelines from the American Urological Association (Monatague et al, 2005; Monatague et al, 2006).

Researchers have been examining less invasive alternatives to surgery for Peyronie's disease.  A number of studies have examined the effectiveness of transdermal administration of verapamil as a treatment for Peyronie's disease.  One study found a non-significant improvement in penile curvature with transdermal administration of verapamil (Greenfield et al, 2007).  Greenfield et al (2007) stated that while surgery remains the gold standard of therapy to correct the acquired curvature of Peyronie's disease, the search for a less invasive therapy continues.  Transdermal drug delivery was proposed to be superior to oral or injection therapy because it bypasses hepatic metabolism and minimizes the pain of injection.  After electromotive drug administration with verapamil tunica albuginea specimens were demonstrated to contain detectable levels of the drug.  Due to varying success with verapamil as injectable therapy for Peyronie's disease, these researchers performed a double-blind, placebo controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of verapamil delivered through electromotive drug administration.  A total of 42 men with Peyronie's disease volunteered to participate in this study, which was approved by the authors' institutional review board.  A genito-urinary examination was performed on all patients, including plaque location, stretched penile length, objective measurement of curvature after papaverine injection and duplex ultrasound.  Each subject was randomized to receive 10 mg verapamil in 4 cc saline or 4 cc saline via electromotive drug administration.  A Mini-Physionizer (Physion, Mirandola, Italy) device was used at a power of 2.4 mA for 20 minutes.  Treatments were performed 2 times weekly for 3 months.  After 3 months each patient was re-evaluated with physical examination and duplex ultrasound by a technician blinded to the treatment received.  A modified erectile dysfunction index of treatment satisfaction questionnaire was also completed by each patient.  A total of 23 patients were randomized to the verapamil treatment group (group 1) and 19 were randomized to the saline group (group 2).  There were no significant differences between patient groups with respect to patient age, disease duration or pretreatment curvature.  In group 1, 15 patients (65 %) had measured improvement (mean 9.1 degrees, range 5 to 30), 5 (22 %) had no change and in 3 (13 %) the condition worsened.  In group 2, 11 patients (58 %) had measured improvement (mean 7.6 degrees, range 5 to 30), 7 (37 %) showed no change and in 1 (5 %) the condition worsened.  To better evaluate effectiveness the total number of patients experiencing significant improvement (20 degrees or greater) was calculated and compared.  Seven patients (30 %) in group 1 and 4 (21 %) in group 2 achieved this criterion.  The authors found that, although a greater percent of patients treated with verapamil in the electromotive drug administration protocol had a measured decrease in curvature, the results were not statistically significant.  The authors stated that further research is needed to determine whether electric current may have a role in the treatment of Peyronie's disease as well as if verapamil delivered via electromotive drug administration may have a role as effective treatment.

Cabello Benavente et al (2005) reported on a small, uncontrolled study of the effects of transdermal iontophoresis with verapamil and dexamethasone in patients with early Peyronie's disease, finding effects on pain, but limited effects on curvature.  These researchers treated 10 patients with Peyronie's disease of less than 1 year of evolution twice-weekly during 6 consecutive weeks using iontophoresis with a Miniphysionizer dispositive.  This device generates a 2-mA electric current during 20 mins that triggers the transdermal penetration of medication.  In every session dexamethasone 8 mg and verapamil 5 mg were administered inside a small self-adhesive receptacle on the penile skin overlying the fibrosis plaque.  To evaluate the efficacy, penile curvature was measured by Kelami's test, while the plaque size was assessed by penile ultrasound.  Other parameters like pain, erectile function and ability for vaginal intercourse were recorded using questionnaires.  Safety parameters were also assessed during treatment.  No improvement or progression in penile curvature was evidenced in any of the patients.  The hardness of the plaque was reduced in 5 patients, becoming impalpable in 2 of them.  Decrease in plaque volume was observed by penile ultrasound in 6.  Pain improved in 8 patients, disappearing in 6 of them.  One patient recovered his erectile function at the end of the treatment; whereas 3 referred that their ability for intercourse enhanced while 2 reported that treatment improved their sexual life in general.  These researchers didn't record any significantly side effects, except for a transitory and slight dermal redness on the site of electrode placement.  The authors concluded that transdermal iontophoresis had an effect on pain control in early stages of Peyronie's disease, but efficacy in reducing penile curvature seems to be limited.  They stated that controlled clinical trials are needed, and perhaps reviewing indications in order to obtain more relevant clinical effects.

Shirazi et al (2009) assessed the effect of intra-lesional verapamil on the treatment of Peyronie's disease.  This randomized study involved 80 patients.  First, they were divided into 2 groups -- the 1st group (case: 40 patients) received intra-lesional verapamil and the 2nd group (control: 40 patients) local saline injection.  They were followed about 24 weeks and evaluated for the size of plaques, plaque softening, reduction of pain and amelioration of penile deformity and erectile dysfunction (ED) (estimated by the International Index of Erectile Function) before and after treatment.  Reduction of plaque size was seen in 17.5 % of the case group and 12.8 % of the control group (p = 0.755).  Pain was reduced in 30 % of the case group and 28.2 % of the control group (p = 0.99).  Curvature was decreased in 17.5 % of the case group and 23.1 % the control group (p = 0.586).  Plaque softening was seen in 30 % of the case group compared with 25.6 % improvement in the control group (p = 0.803).  Also these investigators found 5 % and 2.6 % improvement in sexual dysfunction in the case and control groups, respectively (p = 0.985).  The authors concluded that although in some studies verapamil has been found to be effective in the treatment of Peyronie's disease, these researchers did not find any improvement in comparison with the control group.  They stated that larger scale studies are warranted to assess the effect of this drug on the treatment of Peyronie's disease.

Heidari et al (2010) evaluated the effect of intra-lesional injection of verapamil in Peyronie's plaque with confirmed lesion.  This randomized clinical trial was performed between March 2005 and March 2006 on 16 patients with Peyronie's disease.  Performing a comprehensive physical examination, the genitalia of the patients were checked to confirm the diagnosis and reject other sexual disorders.  Besides, parameters such as penis curving, lesion size were measured.  Then, based on the 10-point visual analog scale, sexual satisfaction of patients and their wives were recorded in a questionnaire.  Patients got intra-lesional verapamil every 14 days and were treated for 6 months.  After that, the parameters were assessed and data collected was analyzed using paired t-test.  P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.  On average, lesion size and penis curving decreased 30 %.  Almost 20 % of patients and their wives were satisfied with the outcome of the treatment.  No significant side effect was seen during the treatment.  The authors concluded that injection of calcium channel blockers are effective for treatment of the Peyronie's disease; however, more studies with more patients are needed.

Early studies suggested a potential benefit on neurogenic ED (NED) from percutaneous electrostimulation of the perineum, although additional studies are needed.  Shafik et al (2008) examined the hypothesis that percutaneous perineal stimulation evokes erection in patients with NED.  Percutaneous electro-stimulation of the perineum (PESP) with synchronous intra-corporeal pressure (ICP) recording was performed in 28 healthy volunteers (age of 36.3 +/- 7.4 years) and 18 patients (age of 36.6 +/- 6.8 years) with complete NED.  Current was delivered in a sine wave summation fashion.  Average maximal voltages and number of stimulations delivered per session were 15 to 18 volts and 15 to 25 stimulations, respectively.  Percutaneous perineal electro-stimulation of healthy volunteers resulted in an increase in ICP (p < 0.0001), which returned to the basal value upon cessation of stimulation.  The latent period recorded was 2.5 +/- 0.2 seconds.  Results were reproducible on repeated PESP in the same subject but with an increase of the latent period.  Patients with NED recorded an ICP increase that was lower (p < 0.05) and a latent period that was longer (p < 0.0001) than those of healthy volunteers.  The authors concluded that PESP resulted in ICP increase in the healthy volunteers and patients with NED.  The ICP was significantly higher and latent period shorter in the healthy volunteers than in patients with NED.  They noted that PESP may be of value in the treatment of patients with NED, provided that further studies are carried out to reproduce these results.

There is reliable evidence that oral phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors (e.g., sildenafil, vardenafil, tadalafil, mirodenafil, and udenafil) improve erectile functioning in men with ED.  However, there is a lack of reliable evidence of the efficacy of hormonal treatments and the value of hormone testing for ED.

The American College of Physicians (ACP) developed guidelines on hormonal testing and pharmacological treatments of ED (Qaseem et al, 2009).  Current drug therapies include PDE-5 inhibitors as well as hormonal treatment.  The ACP recommended (i) clinicians initiate therapy with a PDE-5 inhibitor in men who seek treatment for erectile dysfunction and who do not have a contra-indication to PDE-5 inhibitor use, and (ii) clinicians base the choice of a specific PDE-5 inhibitor on the individual preferences of men with erectile dysfunction, including ease of use, cost of medication, and adverse effects profile.  The ACP did not recommend for or against routine use of hormonal blood tests or hormonal treatment in the management of patients with ED.

In a systematic review and meta-analysis, Tsertsvadze and colleagues (2009) evaluated the efficacy and harms of oral PDE-5 inhibitors and hormonal treatments for ED and assessed the effect of measuring serum hormone levels on treatment outcomes for ED.  The authors concluded that oral PDE-5 inhibitors improved erectile functioning and had similar safety and efficacy profiles.  However, results on the efficacy of hormonal treatments and the value of hormone testing in men with ED were inconclusive.  The authors selected randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) of oral PDE-5 inhibitors and hormonal treatment for ED, and observational studies reporting measurement of serum hormone levels, prevalence of hormonal abnormalities, or both in men with ED.  Two independent reviewers abstracted data on study, participant, and treatment characteristics; efficacy and harms outcomes; and prevalence of hormonal abnormalities.  Data, primarily from short-term trials (less than or equal to 12 weeks), indicate that PDE-5 inhibitors were more effective than placebo in improving sexual intercourse success (69.0 % versus 35.0 %).  The proportion of men with improved erections was significantly greater among those treated with PDE-5 inhibitors (range of 67.0 % to 89.0 %) than with placebo (range of 27.0 % to 35.0 %).  The PDE-5 inhibitors were associated with increased risk for any adverse events compared with placebo (e.g., relative risk with sildenafil, 1.72 [95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.53 to 1.93]).  In 4 head-to-head RCTs comparing sildenafil, vardenafil, and tadalafil, improvement of ED and adverse events did not differ among treatments.  Results from 15 RCTs evaluating hormonal treatment of ED were inconsistent on whether treatment improved outcomes.  Evidence was insufficient regarding whether men with ED had a higher prevalence of hypo-gonadism than men without ED. 

There is insufficient evidence of the effectiveness of acupuncture for the treatment of ED.  In a systematic review, Lee et al (2009) found insufficient evidence for the use of acupuncture in the treatment of ED.  Systematic searches were conducted in 15 electronic databases, with no language restrictions.  Hand-searches included conference proceedings and the authors' files.  All clinical studies of acupuncture as a treatment for ED were considered for inclusion, and their methodological quality was assessed using the Jadad score.  Of the 4 studies included, 1 RCT showed beneficial effects of acupuncture compared with sham acupuncture in terms of response rate, while another RCT found no effects of acupuncture.  The remaining 2 studies were uncontrolled clinical trials.  Collectively, these data showed that RCTs of acupuncture for ED are feasible but scarce.  Most investigations had methodological flaws (e.g., inadequate study design, poor reporting of results, small sample size, and publication without appropriate peer review process).  The authors concluded that the evidence is insufficient to suggest that acupuncture is an effective intervention for treating ED.  They stated that further research is needed to examine if there are specific benefits of acupuncture for men with ED.

There is emerging interest in the use of adipose-derived stem cells for treatment of Peyronie's disease.  Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) are a somatic stem cell population contained in fat tissue that possess the ability for self-renewal, differentiation into one or more phenotypes, and functional regeneration of damaged tissue, which may benefit the recovery of erectile function.  Lin et al (2009) reviewed available evidence concerning ADSCs availability, differentiation into functional cells, and the potential of these cells for the treatment of ED.  These researchers examined data from 1964 to 2008 that were associated with the definition, characterization, differentiation, and application of ADSCs, as well as other kinds of stem cells for stem cell-based therapies of erectile dysfunction.  They noted that ADSCs are para-vascularly localized in the adipose tissue.  Under specific induction medium conditions, these cells differentiated into neuron-like cells, smooth muscle cells, and endothelium in vitro.  The insulin-like growth factor/insulin-like growth factor receptor pathway participates in neuronal differentiation while the fibroblast growth factor 2 pathway is involved in endothelium differentiation.  In a preliminary in vivo experiment, the ADSCs functionally recovered the damaged erectile function.  However, the underlying mechanism needs to be further examined.  The authors concluded that ADSCs are a potential source for stem cell-based therapies, which imply the possibility of an effective clinical therapy for ED in the near future.

Other treatments for ED include inflatable penile prostheses, and vacuum erectile devices, and vascular surgery.  Hellstrom and colleagues (2010) provided state-of-the-art knowledge regarding the treatment of ED by implant, mechanical device, and vascular surgery, representing the opinions of 7 experts from 5 countries developed in a consensus process over a 2-year period.  The inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) is indicated for the treatment of patients with organic ED after failure or rejection of other treatment options.  Comparisons between the IPP and other forms of ED therapy generally reveal a higher satisfaction rate in men with ED who chose the prosthesis.  Organic ED responds well to vacuum erection device (VED) therapy, especially among men with a sub-optimal response to intra-cavernosal pharmacotherapy.  After radical prostatectomy, VED therapy combined with PDE-5 therapy improved sexual satisfaction in patients dissatisfied with VED alone.  Penile re-vascularization surgery seems most successful in young men with absence of venous leakage and isolated stenosis of the internal pudendal artery following perineal or pelvic trauma.  Currently, surgery to limit venous leakage is not recommended.  The authors stated that more research is needed in the area of re-vascularization surgery, in particular, venous outflow surgery.

Hilz and Marthol (2003) stated that neurogenic, particularly autonomic disorders, frequently contribute to the etiology and pathophysiology of ED.  Parasympathetic and sympathetic outflow mediates erection.  Non-cholinergic, non-adrenergic neurotransmitters induce activation of cyclic monophosphates, leading to relaxation of smooth muscles of the corpora cavernosa and by this to tumescence and rigidity, i.e., erection.  The diagnosis of neurologic causes of ED requires a detailed history and neurologic examination.  Conventional neurophysiological procedures evaluate the function of rapidly conducting, thickly myelinated nerve fibers only.  Therefore, techniques such as sphincter ani externus electromyography, latency measurements of the pudendal nerve or bulbocavernosus reflex studies frequently do not contribute to the diagnostic process.  The evaluation of small nerve fibers that are essential for erection, for example by means of psychophysical quantitative thermo-testing, might improve the diagnosis of neurogenic causes of ED.  In addition, the assessment of heart rate variability at rest, during metronomic breathing, Valsalva maneuver, and active standing might be helpful to identify an autonomic neuropathy as the cause of ED.

Hamdan and Al-Matubsi (2009) noted that ED etiology is multi-factorial, including endocrine, neurological, vascular, systemic disease, local penile disorders, nutrition, psychogenic factors, and drug-related.  This study was performed to compare the relevant comprehensive biochemical parameters as well as the clinical characteristics in diabetic ED and healthy control subjects and to assess the occurrence of penile neuropathy in diabetic patients and thus the relationship between ED and diabetes.  A total of 56 patients accepted to undergo assessment for penile vasculature using intracavernosal injection and color Doppler ultrasonography.  Of the 56 diabetic patients, 38 patients were found with normal blood flow and thus they were considered as the diabetic-ED group, whereas, ED diabetic patients with an arteriogenic component were excluded.  These patients with an age range between 17 and 58 years, complaining of ED, with duration of diabetic illness ranging from 2 to 15 years.  The control group comprised of 30 healthy subject aged between 19 and 55 years.  Peripheral venous levels of testosterone, prolactin, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), malondialdehyde and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1)c) were obtained in all subjects.  Valsalva maneuver and neurophysiological tests were also determined.  Testosterone, prolactin, FSH, LH, and TSH hormones of the diabetic patients were not significantly different from those of the control group.  Diabetic patients with ED have higher HbA(1)c and oxidative stress levels while the R-R ratio was significantly decreased.  Bulbocavernosus reflex latency was significantly prolonged, whereas its amplitude, the conduction velocity and amplitude of dorsal nerve of penis were significantly reduced in the diabetic patients.  The authors concluded that although ED is a multi-factorial disorder, yet, the present study revealed that in ED patients without arteriogenic ED a neurogenic component is present.  Furthermore, the complex effect of the Valsalva maneuver on cardiovascular function is the basis of its usefulness as a measure of autonomic function.  Thus, it can be of value in the diagnosis of ED although these hypotheses require follow-up in a large study cohort.

Lin et al (2012) noted that current therapeutic options for ED are less effective for patients having cavernous nerve (CN) injury or diabetes mellitus-related ED.  These 2 types of ED are thus the main focus of past and current stem cell (SC) therapy studies.  In a total of 16 studies so far, rats were exclusively used as disease models and SCs were mostly derived from bone marrow, adipose tissue, or skeletal muscle.  For tracking, SCs were labeled with LacZ, green fluorescent protein, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, DiI, bromodeoxyuridine, or 5-ethynyl-2-deoxyuridine, some of which might have led to data misinterpretation.  Stem cell transplantation was done exclusively by intra-cavernous (IC) injection, which has been recently shown to have systemic effects.  Functional assessment was done exclusively by measuring increases of IC pressure during electro-stimulation of CN.  Histological assessment usually focused on endothelial, smooth muscle, and CN contents in the penis.  In general, favorable outcomes have been obtained in all trials so far, although whether SCs had differentiated into specific cell lineages remains controversial.  Recent studies have shown that intra-cavernously injected SCs rapidly escaped the penis and homed into bone marrow.  This could perhaps explain why intra-cavernously injected SCs had systemic anti-diabetic effects and prolonged anti-ED effects.  The authors stated that these hypotheses and the differentiation-versus-paracrine debate require further investigation.

In an open-label, single-arm, prospective study, Gruenwald and colleagues (2012) noted that low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy (LI-ESWT) has been reported as an effective treatment in men with mild and moderate ED.  These investigators determined the effectiveness of LI-ESWT in severe ED patients who were poor responders to PDE-5 inhibitor (PDE5i) therapy.  Patients with an erection hardness score (EHS) less than or equal to 2 at baseline were included in this study.  The protocol comprised 2 treatment sessions per week for 3 weeks, which were repeated after a 3-week no-treatment interval.  Patients were followed at 1 month (FU1), and only then an active PDE5i medication was provided for an additional month until final follow-up visit (FU2).  At each treatment session, LI-ESWT was applied on the penile shaft and crus at 5 different anatomical sites (300 shocks, 0.09 mJ/mm(2) intensity at 120 shocks/min).  Each subject underwent a full baseline assessment of erectile function using validated questionnaires and objective penile hemodynamic testing before and after LI-ESWT.  Outcome measures used were changes in the International Index of Erectile Function-erectile function domain (IIEF-ED) scores, the EHS measurement, and the 3 parameters of penile hemodynamics and endothelial function.  A total of 29 men (mean age of 61.3 years) completed the study.  Their mean IIEF-ED scores increased from 8.8 +/- 1 (baseline) to 12.3 +/- 1 at FU1 (p = 0.035).  At FU2 (on active PDE5i treatment), their IIEF-ED further increased to 18.8 +/- 1 (p < 0.0001), and 72.4 % (p < 0.0001) reached an EHS of greater than or equal to 3 (allowing full sexual intercourse).  A significant improvement (p = 0.0001) in penile hemodynamics was detected after treatment and this improvement significantly correlated with increases in the IIEF-ED (p < 0.05).  No noteworthy adverse events were reported.  The authors concluded that penile LI-ESWT is a new modality that has the potential to treat a subgroup of severe ED patients.  Moreover, they stated that these preliminary data need to be confirmed by multi-center sham control studies in a larger group of ED patients with long-term follow-up.

Zhang et al (2013) stated that several studies have reported the influence of the insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism in the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene on ED susceptibility, but the results remain controversial.  These investigators performed a meta-analysis using data published to derive a more precise estimation of the relationship,.  A total of 6 case-control studies, including 1,039 cases and 927 controls, were selected.  The pooled odds ratios (ORs) and respective 95 % CIs were calculated by comparing the carriers of D-allele with the wild homozygotes (ID + DD versus II).  Comparisons of other genetic models were also performed (ID + II versus DD, DD versus II, DI versus II and D versus I).  In the overall analysis, no significant association between the polymorphism and ED risk was observed (OR = 1.07, 95 % CI: 0.84 to 1.37, p = 0.575 for ID + DD versus II).  In the subgroup analysis by ethnic, no significant association was detected among Asian, Latino and European for the comparison of ID + DD versus II (Asian: OR = 1.27, 95 % CI: 0.89 to 1.81; Latino: OR = 0.76, 95 % CI: 0.46 to 1.27; European: OR = 1.06, 95 % CI: 0.67 to 1.66).  Results from other comparative genetic models also indicated the lack of associations between this polymorphism and ED risk.  The authors concluded that this meta-analysis indicated that the ACE I/D polymorphism might not contribute to the risk of ED.

Xu and colleagues (2013) evaluated the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on ED in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS).  These investigators searched Cochrane Library, PubMed, China Academic Journal Full-Text Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Wanfang Resource Database and Chinese Journal Full-Text Database for clinical trials on the effect of CPAP on ED in OSAS patients.  They identified the trials according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, evaluated their quality, and then extracted valid data for meta-analysis.  These researchers included 4 articles, 3 in English and 1 in Chinese, involving 77 cases of OSAS with ED.  Meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant heterogeneity among different studies (p = 0.80; I2 = 0 %), and therefore the fixed effect model was used for the analysis, which showed a significant increase in the IIEF-5 score after CPAP treatment (WMD = 4.19, 95 % CI: 3.01 to 5.36, p < 0.001).  The authors concluded that the existing evidence from clinical trials showed that the CPAP therapy can significantly improve ED in OSAS patients.  Moreover, they stated that its effectiveness has to be verified by RCTs of higher quality and larger sample size.

Jordan (2008) evaluated the safety and effectiveness of intra-lesional clostridial collagenase injection therapy in a series of patients with Peyronie's disease.  A total of 25 patients aged 21 to 75 years who were referred to a single institution with a well-defined Peyronie's disease plaque were treated with three intra-lesional injections of clostridial collagenase 10,000 units in a small volume (0.25 cm(3) per injection) administered over 7 to 10 days, with a repeat treatment (i.e., 3 injections of collagenase 10,000 units/25 cm(3) injection over 7 to 10 days) at 3 months.  Primary efficacy measures were changes from baseline in the deviation angle and plaque size.  Secondary efficacy end-points were patient responses to a Peyronie's disease questionnaire and improvement according to the investigators' global evaluation of change.  The primary efficacy measures were change in deviation angle and change in plaque size.  Secondary end-points were patient questionnaire responses and improvement according to the investigators' global evaluation of change.  Significant decreases from baseline were achieved in the mean deviation angle at months 3 (p = 0.0001) and 6 (p = 0.0012), plaque width at months 3 (p = 0.0052), 6 (p = 0.0239), and 9 (p = 0.0484), and plaque length at months 3 (p = 0.0018) and 6 (p = 0.0483).  More than 50 % of patients in this series considered themselves "very much improved" or "much improved" at all time-points in the study, and the drug was generally well-tolerated.  The authors concluded that the benefits of intra-lesional clostridial collagenase injections in this trial lent support to prior studies supporting its use in the management of Peyronie's disease.  Moreover, they noted that a double-blind, placebo-controlled study is currently under development.

In a phase IIb, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study, Gelbard and colleagues (2012) examined the safety and effectiveness of collagenase Clostridium histolyticum and assessed a patient reported outcome questionnaire.  A total of 147 subjects were randomized into 4 groups to receive collagenase C. histolyticum or placebo (3:1) with or without penile plaque modeling (1:1).  Per treatment cycle 2 injections of collagenase C. histolyticum (0.58 mg) were given 24 to 72 hours apart.  Subjects received up to 3 cycles at 6-week intervals.  When designated, investigator modeling was done 24 to 72 hours after the second injection of each cycle.  These researchers evaluated penile curvature by goniometer measurement, patient reported outcomes and adverse event profiles.  After collagenase C. histolyticum treatment significant improvements in penile curvature (29.7 % versus 11.0 %, p = 0.001) and patient reported outcome symptom bother scores (p = 0.05) were observed compared to placebo.  In modeled subjects 32.4 % improvement in penile curvature was observed in those on collagenase C. histolyticum compared to 2.5 % worsening of curvature in those on placebo (p < 0.001).  Those treated with collagenase C. histolyticum who underwent modeling also showed improved Peyronie disease symptom bother scores (p = 0.004).  In subjects without modeling there were minimal differences between the active and placebo cohorts.  Most adverse events in the collagenase C. histolyticum group occurred at the injection site and were mild or moderate in severity.  No treatment related serious adverse events were reported.  The authors concluded that collagenase C. histolyticum treatment was well-tolerated.  Moreover, they noted significant improvement in penile curvature and patient reported outcome symptom bother scores, suggesting that this may be a safe, non-surgical alternative for Peyronie disease.

Gelbard et al (2013) stated that IMPRESS (Investigation for Maximal Peyronie's Reduction Efficacy and Safety Studies) I and II examined the clinical safety and effectiveness of collagenase C. histolyticum intra-lesional injections in subjects with Peyronie disease.  Co-primary outcomes in these identical phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled studies included the percent change in the penile curvature abnormality and the change in the Peyronie disease questionnaire symptom bother score from baseline to 52 weeks.  IMPRESS I and II examined collagenase C. histolyticum intra-lesional injections in 417 and 415 subjects, respectively, through a maximum of 4 treatment cycles, each separated by 6 weeks.  Men received up to 8 injections of 0.58 mg collagenase C. histolyticum that are 2 injections per cycle separated by approximately 24 to 72 hours with the second injection of each followed 24 to 72 hours later by penile plaque modeling.  Men were stratified by baseline penile curvature (30 to 60 versus 61 to 90 degrees) and randomized to collagenase C. histolyticum or placebo 2:1 in favor of the former.  Post hoc meta-analysis of IMPRESS I and II data revealed that men treated with collagenase C. histolyticum showed a mean 34 % improvement in penile curvature, representing a mean ± SD -17.0 ± 14.8 degree change per subject, compared with a mean 18.2 % improvement in placebo treated men, representing a mean -9.3 ± 13.6 degree change per subject (p <0.0001).  The mean change in Peyronie disease symptom bother score was significantly improved in treated men versus men on placebo (-2.8 ± 3.8 versus -1.8 ± 3.5, p = 0.0037).  Three serious adverse events (corporeal rupture) were surgically repaired.  The authors concluded that IMPRESS I and II supported the clinical safety and effectiveness of collagenase C. histolyticum for the physical and psychological aspects of Peyronie disease.

On December 6, 2013, the FDA approved a new use for Xiaflex (collagenase clostridium histolyticum) as the first FDA-approved medicine for the treatment of Peyronie’s disease.  A treatment course for Peyronie’s disease consists of a maximum of 4 treatment cycles.  Each treatment cycle consists of 2 Xiaflex injection procedures (in which Xiaflex is injected directly into the collagen-containing structure of the penis) and 1 penile modeling procedure performed by the health care professional.  The safety and effectiveness of Xiaflex for the treatment of Peyronie’s disease were established in 2 randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in 832 men with Peyronie’s disease with penile curvature deformity of at least 30 degrees.  Participants were given up to 4 treatment cycles of Xiaflex or placebo and were then followed 52 weeks.  Xiaflex treatment significantly reduced penile curvature deformity and related bothersome effects compared with placebo.  The most common adverse reactions associated with use of Xiaflex for Peyronie’s disease include penile hematoma, penile swelling and penile pain.

According to the FDA, when prescribed for the treatment of Peyronie’s disease, Xiaflex is available only through a restricted program under a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) because of the risks of serious adverse reactions, including penile fracture (rupture of one of the penile bodies within the penile shaft, also known as corporal rupture) and other serious penile injury.  Xiaflex for the treatment of Peyronie’s disease should be administered by a health care professional who is experienced in the treatment of male urological diseases.  The REMS requires participating health care professionals to be certified within the program by enrolling and completing training in the administration of Xiaflex treatment for Peyronie’s disease.  The REMS also requires health care facilities to be certified within the program and ensure that Xiaflex is dispensed only for use by certified health care professionals.

 
CPT Codes / HCPCS Codes / ICD-9 Codes
CPT codes covered if selection criteria are met:
37788
54110 - 54112
54200 - 54205
54230
54231
54235
54400 - 54417
74445
78012
80061
80076
81000 - 81003
82565
82947
83001 - 83002
83727
84146
84152 - 84154
84402 - 84403
85025 - 85027
93975 - 93976
93980 - 93981
CPT codes not covered for indications listed in the CPB:
0019T
0101T
37790
38240
38241
38242
51792
54240
54250
64565
64580
64585
64590
64595
83550
84066
95907 - 95912
95925 - 95927
97014
97032
97810 - 97814
Other CPT codes related to the CPB:
96372
HCPCS codes covered if selection criteria are met:
C1813 Prosthesis, penile, inflatable
C2622 Prosthesis, penile, non-inflatable
C9023 Injection, testosterone undecanoate, 1 mg
J0270 Injection, alprostadil, 1.25 mcg (code may be used for Medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self-administered)
J0275 Alprostadil urethral suppository (code may be used for Medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self-administered)
J0775 Injection, collagenase, clostridium histolyticum, 0.01 mg
J2440 Injection, papaverine HCl, up to 60 mg
J2760 Injection, phentolamine mesylate, up to 5 mg
L7900 Male vacuum erection system
L7902 Tension ring, for vacuum erection device, any type, replacement only, each
HCPCS codes not covered for indications listed in the CPB:
J0900 Injection, testosterone enanthate and estradiol valerate, up to 1 cc
J1060 Injection, testosterone cypionate and estradiol cypionate, up to 1 ml
J1070 Injection, testosterone cypionate, up to 100 mg
J1080 Injection, testosterone cypionate, 1cc, 200 mg
J3120 Injection, testosterone enanthate, up to 100 mg
J3130 Injection, testosterone enanthate, up to 200 mg
J3140 Injection, testosterone suspension, up to 50 mg
J3150 Injection, testosterone propionate, up to 100 mg
J9213 Injection, interferon alpha-2A, recombinant, 3 million units
J9214 Injection, interferon alpha-2B, recombinant, 1 million units
J9215 Injection, interferon alpha-N3, (human leukocyte derived), 250,000 IU
S0090 Sildenafil citrate, 25 mg
ICD-9 codes covered if selection criteria are met:
257.2 Other testicular hypofunction
440.8 - 440.9 Atherosclerosis of other specified arteries or generalized and unspecified atherosclerosis [focal blockage of penile arterial flow demonstrated by duplex Doppler ultrasonography or arteriography]
607.82 Vascular disorders of penis [focal blockage of penile arterial flow demonstrated by duplex Doppler ultrasonography or arteriography]
607.84 Impotence of organic origin
607.85 Peyronie's disease
902.50, 902.54, 902.59 Injury to iliac vessel(s), unspecified, iliac vein, or other iliac blood vessel [arterial injury caused by blunt trauma to the pelvis and /or perineum]
ICD-9 codes not covered for indications listed in the CPB:
302.70 Psychosexual dysfunction, unspecified
302.71 Hypoactive sexual desire disorder
302.72 Psychosexual dysfunction with inhibited sexual excitement (impotence)
302.74 Male orgasmic disorder
302.75 Premature ejaculation
302.79 Psychosexual dysfunction, with other specified psychosexual dysfunctions
Other ICD-9 codes related to the CPB:
240.0 - 246.9 Disorder of thyroid gland
250.00 - 250.93 Diabetes mellitus [not covered for surgical revascularization]


The above policy is based on the following references:
  1. Isidori A, Aversa A, Fabbri A. Erectile dysfunction. Recenti Prog Med. 1999;90(7-8):396-402.
  2. Rolo F, Requixa A. Erectile dysfunction. Its diagnosis and treatment. Acta Med Port. 1999;12(1-3):35-38.
  3. Nehra A, Barrett DM, Moreland RB. Pharmacotherapeutic advances in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Mayo Clin Proc. 1999;74(7):709-721.
  4. Lizza EF, Rosen RC. Definition and classification of erectile dysfunction: Report of the Nomenclature Committee of the International Society of Impotence Research. Int J Impot Res. 1999;11(3):141-143.
  5. Shokeir AA, Alserafi MA, Mutabagani H. Intracavernosal versus intraurethral alprostadil: A prospective randomized study. BJU Int. 1999;83(7):812-815.
  6. The Process of Care Consensus Panel. The process of care model for evaluation and treatment of erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 1999;11(2):59-74.
  7. Sadovsky R, Dunn M, Grobe BM. Erectile dysfunction: The primary care practitioner's view. Am J Manag Care. 1999;5(3):333-341; quiz 342-343.
  8. Kunelius P, Lukkarinen O. Intracavernous self-injection of prostaglandin E1 in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 1999;11(1):21-24.
  9. Shmueli J, Israilov S, Segenreich E, et al. Progressive treatment of erectile dysfunction with intracorporeal injections of different combinations of vasoactive agents. Int J Impot Res. 1999;11(1):15-19.
  10. Sharlip ID. Evaluation and nonsurgical management of erectile dysfunction. Urol Clin North Am. 1998;25(4):647-659, ix.
  11. Jordan GH. Erectile function and dysfunction. Postgrad Med. 1999;105(2):131-134, 137-138, 143-144 passim.
  12. Wierman ME. Advances in the diagnosis and management of impotence. Dis Mon. 1999;45(1):1-20.
  13. Handelsman H. Diagnosis and treatment of impotence. Health Technol Assess Rep. 1990;(2):1-23.
  14. Lakin M. The evaluation and nonsurgical management of impotence. Semin Nephrol. 1994;14(6):544-550.
  15. No authors listed. Impotence. NIH Consens Statement. 1992;10(4):1-33.
  16. Montague DK. Clinical guidelines panel on erectile dysfunction: Summary report on the treatment of organic erectile dysfunction. The American Urological Association. J Urol. 1996;156(6):2007-2011.
  17. No authors listed. American Urological Association issues treatment guidelines for erectile dysfunction. Am Fam Physician. 1997;55(5):1967-1968, 1973.
  18. Bennett AH, Carpenter AJ. An improved vasoactive drug combination for a pharmacologic erection program (PEP). J Urol. 1991;146(6):1564-1565.
  19. Broderick GA, Allen GA, McClure RD. Vacuum tumescence devices: The role of papaverine in the selection of patients. J Urol. 1991;145(2):284-286.
  20. No authors listed. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Technology Assessment. Penile implants for erectile impotence. JAMA. 1988;260(7):997-1000.
  21. No authors listed. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Technology Assessment. Intracavernous pharmacotherapy for impotence: Papaverine and phentolamine. JAMA. 1990;264(6):752-754.
  22. Kessler WO. Nocturnal penile tumescence. Urol Clin North Am. 1988;15(1):81-86.
  23. Krane RJ, Goldstein I, Saenz de Tejada I. Impotence. N Engl J Med. 1989;321(24):1648-1659.
  24. No authors listed. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Impotence. JAMA. 1993;270(1):83-90.
  25. Kedia S, Zippe CD, Agarwal A, et al. Treatment of erectile dysfunction with sildenafil citrate (Viagra) after radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Urology. 1999;54(2):308-312.
  26. Setter SM, Baker DE, Campbell RK, et al. Sildenafil (Viagra) for the treatment of erectile dysfunction in men with diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 1999;25(1):79-80, 83-84, 87 passim.
  27. Licht MR. Use of oral sildenafil (Viagra) in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Compr Ther. 1999;25(2):90-94.
  28. Aldridge J, Measham F. Sildenafil (Viagra) is used as a recreational drug in England. BMJ. 1999;318(7184):669.
  29. Cheitlin MD, Hutter AM Jr, Brindis RG, et al. ACC/AHA expert consensus document. Use of sildenafil (Viagra) in patients with cardiovascular disease. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33(1):273-282.
  30. Morales A, Gingell C, Collins M, et al. Clinical safety of oral sildenafil citrate (VIAGRA) in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 1998;10(2):69-73; discussion 73-74.
  31. Sica GS, Sileri P, Riccardelli F, et al. Revascularization of the corpora cavernosa in vasculogenic impotence. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 1999;51(2):129-134.
  32. Manning M, Junemann KP, Scheepe JR, et al. Long-term followup and selection criteria for penile revascularization in erectile failure. J Urol. 1998;160(5):1680-1684.
  33. Hauri D. A critical review of penile revascularization procedures. Urol Int. 1998;60(3):133-146.
  34. Sarramon JP, Bertrand N, Malavaud B, et al. Microrevascularisation of the penis in vascular impotence. Int J Impot Res. 1997;9(3):127-133.
  35. Sharaby JS, Benet AE, Melman A. Penile revascularization. Urol Clin North Am. 1995;22(4):821-832.
  36. Matthews LA, Herbener TE, Seftel AD. Impotence associated with blunt pelvic and perineal trauma: Penile revascularization as a treatment option. Semin Urol. 1995;13(1):66-72.
  37. Janssen T, Sarramon JP, Rischmann P, et al. Microsurgical arterio-arterial and arterio-venous penile revascularization in patients with pure arteriogenic impotence. Br J Urol. 1994;73(5):561-565.
  38. Motiwala HG, Patel DD, Joshi SP, et al. Experience with penile venous surgery. Urol Int. 1993;51(1):9-14.
  39. Schmid DM, Schurch B, Hauri D. Sildenafil in the treatment of sexual dysfunction in spinal cord-injured male patients. Eur Urol. 2000;38(2):184-193.
  40. Hultling C, Giuliano F, Quirk F, et al. Quality of life in patients with spinal cord injury receiving Viagra (sildenafil citrate) for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Spinal Cord. 2000;38(6):363-370.
  41. Benevides MD, Carson CC. Intraurethral application of alprostadil in patients with failed inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol. 2000;163(3):785-787.
  42. Ensign C. First-line therapies for erectile dysfunction. JAAPA. 2001;14(10):17-20.
  43. Hatzichristou DG, Pescatori ES. Current treatments and emerging therapeutic approaches in male erectile dysfunction. BJU Int. 2001;88(Suppl 3):11-17.
  44. Montorsi F, Salonia A, Zanoni M, et al. Current status of local penile therapy. Int J Impot Res. 2002;14(Suppl 1):S70-S81.
  45. Pickard RS, Powell PH, Schofield IS. The clinical application of dorsal penile nerve cerebral-evoked response recording in the investigation of impotence. Br J Urol. 1994;74(2):231-235.
  46. Bemelmans BL, Hendrikx LB, Koldewijn EL, et al. Comparison of biothesiometry and neuro-urophysiological investigations for the clinical evaluation of patients with erectile dysfunction. J Urol. 1995;153(5):1483-1486.
  47. American Academy of Neurology. Assessment: Neurological evaluation of male sexual dysfunction. Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 1995;45(12):2287-2292.
  48. Delodovici ML, Fowler CJ. Clinical value of the pudendal somatosensory evoked potential. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995;96(6):509-515.
  49. Broderick GA. Evidence based assessment of erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 1998;10 Suppl 2:S64-S73; discussion S77-S79.
  50. McMahon CG, Touma K. Predictive value of patient history and correlation of nocturnal penile tumescence, colour duplex Doppler ultrasonography and dynamic cavernosometry and cavernosography in the evaluation of erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 1999;11(1):47-51.
  51. Da Ros CT, Teloken C, Antonini CC, et al. Long-term results of penile vein ligation for erectile dysfunction due to cavernovenous disease. Tech Urol. 2000;6(3):172-174.
  52. Rao DS, Donatucci CF. Vasculogenic impotence. Arterial and venous surgery. Urol Clin North Am. 2001;28(2):309-319.
  53. Sakamoto H, Shimada M, Yoshida H. Hemodynamic evaluation of the penile arterial system in patients with erectile dysfunction using power Doppler imaging. Urology. 2002;60(3):480-484.
  54. Golubinski AJ, Sikorski A. Usefulness of power Doppler ultrasonography in evaluating erectile dysfunction. BJU Int. 2002;89(7):779-782.
  55. Wespes E, Amar E, Hatzichristou D, et al. Guidelines on erectile dysfunction. Eur Urol. 2002;41(1):1-5.
  56. Speel TG, van Langen H, Wijkstra H, Meuleman EJ. Penile duplex pharmaco-ultrasonography revisited: Revalidation of the parameters of the cavernous arterial response. J Urol. 2003;169(1):216-220.
  57. Nurnberg HG, Hensley PL, Gelenberg AJ, et al. Treatment of antidepressant-associated sexual dysfunction with sildenafil: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;289(1):56-64.
  58. Martin DJ, Badwan K, Parker M, Mulhall JP. Transdermal application of verapamil gel to the penile shaft fails to infiltrate the tunica albuginea. J Urol. 2002;168(6):2483-2485.
  59. Burls A, Clark W, Gold L, Simpson S. Sildenafil: An oral drug for the treatment of male erectile dysfunction. Birmingham, UK: West Midlands Health Technology Assessment Collaboration, Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham; 1998.
  60. Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU). Viagra for impotence - early assessment briefs (ALERT). Stockholm, Sweden: SBU; 1999.
  61. Fink HA, MacDonald R, Rutks IR, et al. Sildenafil for male erectile dysfunction. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1349-1360.
  62. Saenz Calvo A, Conde Olasagasti J L, Imaz Iglesia I, Hernandez Torres A. Effectiveness and safety of penile prosthesis. IPE-98/15 (Public report). Madrid, Spain: Agencia de Evaluacion de Tecnologias Sanitarias (AETS); 1998.
  63. U.S. Department of Veteran's Affairs, Veteran's Health Administration, Pharmacy Benefits Management Strategic Healthcare Group and the Medical Advisory Panel. The primary care management of erectile dysfunction. Pub. No. 99-0014. Washington, DC: Department of Veterans Affairs; June 1999.
  64. U.S. Department of Veteran's Affairs, Veteran's Health Administration, Office of Research and Development, Health Services Research and Development Service, Management Decision and Research Center (MDRC), Technology Assessment Program. Treatment options for male erectile dysfunction: A systematic review of published studies of effectiveness. Technology Assessment Program, Report No. 11. MTA98-016. Boston, MA: MDRC; January 1999.
  65. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Male Sexual Dysfunction Task Force. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the evaluation and treatment of male sexual dysfunction: A couple's problem--2003 update. Endocr Pract. 2003;9(1):77-95.
  66. Jain P, Rademaker AW, McVary KT. Testosterone supplementation for erectile dysfunction: Results of a meta-analysis. J Urol. 2000;164(2):371-375.
  67. No authors listed. Testosterone for erectile dysfunction. Bandolier Knowledge Library. Oxford, UK: Bandolier; 2001. Available at: http://www.jr2.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/booth/SexHlth/testo.html. Accessed August 28, 2003.
  68. Jain S, Bhojwani A, Terry TR. The role of penile prosthetic surgery in the modern management of erectile dysfunction. Postgrad Med J. 2000;76:22-25.
  69. Dorey G. Conservative treatment of erectile dysfunction 2: Clinical trials. Br J Nursing, 2000;9(12):755-762.
  70. Laumann L, Zimmerman J. Peyronie disease. eMedicine Dermatology Topic 851. Omaha, NE: eMedicine.com; updated May 13, 2003. Available at: http://www.emedicine.com/derm/topic851.htm. Accessed August 13, 2003.
  71. Lizza E. Peyronie disease. eMedicine Urology Topic 3422. Omaha, NE: eMedicine.com; updated November 15, 2002. Available at: http://www.emedicine.com/med/topic3422.htm. Accessed August 13, 2003.
  72. Manikandan R, Islam W, Srinivasan V, Evans CM. Evaluation of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in Peyronie's disease. Urology. 2002;60(5):795-800.
  73. Kiyota H, Ohishi Y, Asano K, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave treatment for Peyronie's disease using EDAP LT-02; preliminary results. Int J Urol. 2002;9(2):110-113.
  74. Lebret T, Loison G, Herve JM, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of Peyronie's disease: Experience with standard lithotriptor (siemens-multiline). Urology. 2002;59(5):657-661.
  75. Hauck EW, Altinkilic BM, Ludwig M, et al. Extracorporal shock wave therapy in the treatment of Peyronie's disease. First results of a case-controlled approach. Eur Urol. 2000;38(6):663-669; discussion 670.
  76. Husain J, Lynn NN, Jones DK, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the management of Peyronie's disease: Initial experience. BJU Int. 2000;86(4):466-468.
  77. Schroeder-Printzen I, Hauck EW, Weidner W. New aspects in Peyronie's disease--a mini-review. Andrologia. 1999;31 Suppl 1:31-5.
  78. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). Interventional procedures overview of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for Peyronie's disease. IPP Procedure No. 182. London, UK: NICE; March 2003. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/pdf/ip/182overview.pdf. Accessed August 29, 2003.
  79. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) for Peyronie's disease. Interventional Procedures Consultation Document. London, UK: NICE; August 2003. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/article.asp?a=81454. Accessed August 29, 2003.
  80. Webber R. Erectile dysfunction. In: Clinical Evidence. London, UK: BMJ Publishing Group, Ltd.; August 2003.
  81. Fink H, Wilt T, Mac Donald R, et al. Sildenafil for erectile dysfunction (Protocol). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(2):CD001424. 
  82. Chen J, Greenstein A, Sofer M, Matzkin H. Rigiscan versus snap gauge band measurements: Is the extra cost justifiable? Int J Impot Res. 1999;11(6):315-318.
  83. Mizuno I, Fuse H, Fujiuchi Y. Snap-Gauge band compared to RigiScan Plus in a nocturnal penile tumescence study for evaluation of erectile dysfunction. Urol Int. 2003;71(1):96-99.
  84. Basar MM, Atan A, Tekdogan UY. New concept parameters of RigiScan in differentiation of vascular erectile dysfunction: Is it a useful test? Int J Urol. 2001;8(12):686-691.
  85. Broderick GA. Evidence based assessment of erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 1998;10 Suppl 2:S64-S73, S77-S79.
  86. Urciuoli R, Cantisani TA, CarliniI M, et al. Prostaglandin E1 for treatment of erectile dysfunction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(2):CD001784.
  87. Hauck EW, Mueller UO, Bschleipfer T, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for Peyronie's disease: Exploratory meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Urol. 2004;171(2 Pt 1):740-745.
  88. DeForge D, Blackmer J, Moher D, et al. Sexuality and reproductive health following spinal cord injury. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 109. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) 2004.
  89. Brake M, Loertzer H, Horsch R, Keller H. Treatment of Peyronie's disease with local interferon-alpha 2b. BJU Int. 2001;87(7):654-657.
  90. Lacy GL 2nd, Adams DM, Hellstrom WJ. Intralesional interferon-alpha-2b for the treatment of Peyronie's disease. Int J Impot Res. 2002;14(5):336-339.
  91. Dang G, Matern R, Bivalacqua TJ, et al. Intralesional interferon-alpha-2B injections for the treatment of Peyronie's disease. South Med J. 2004;97(1):42-46.
  92. Stewart C, Hogan S. Evidence based review of medicines for sexual dysfunction in men: A report commissioned by the New Zealand Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC). NZHTA Report. Christchurch, New Zealand: New Zealand Health Technology Assessment (NZHTA); 2004;7(4).
  93. Monatague DK, Jarow JP, Broderick GA, et al. Erectile Dysfunction Guideline Update Panel. The management of erectile dysfunction: An update. Linthicum, MD: American Urological Association (AUA); June 2005. J Urol. 2005;174(1):230-239. Available at: http://www.auanet.org/guidelines/edmgmt.cfm. Accessed August 1, 2005.
  94. Matthew AG, Goldman A, Trachtenberg J, et al. Sexual dysfunction after radical prostatectomy: Prevalence, treatments, restricted use of treatments and distress. J Urol. 2005;174(6):2105-2110.
  95. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Decision memo for cavernous nerves electrical stimulation with penile plethysmography (CAG-00311N). Medicare Coverage Database. Baltimore, MD: CMS; August 24, 2006. Available at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/mcd/viewdecisionmemo.asp?id=174. Accessed September 18, 2006.
  96. Monatague DK, Jarow JP, Broderick GA, et al.; Erectile Dysfunction Guideline Update Panel. The management of erectile dysfunction: An update. Linthicum, MD: American Urological Association (AUA); revised May 2006. Available at: http://www.auanet.org/guidelines/edmgmt.cfm. Accessed January 8, 2007.
  97. Kendirci M, Bejma J, Hellstrom WJ. Update on erectile dysfunction in prostate cancer patients. Curr Opin Urol. 2006;16(3):186-195.
  98. Wespes E, Amar E, Hatzichristou D, et al. EAU Guidelines on erectile dysfunction: An update. Eur Urol. 2006;49(5):806-815.
  99. Merino GA. Penile prosthesis implantation in the treatment of erectile dysfunction [summary]. INF2005/02. Santiago de Compostela, Spain: Galician Agency for Health Technology Assessment (AVALIA-T); 2005.
  100. Moore RA, Derry S, McQuay HJ. Indirect comparison of interventions using published randomised trials: systematic review of PDE-5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction. BMC Urology. 2005;5(18).
  101. Vardi M, Nini A. Phosphodiesterase inhibitors for erectile dysfunction in patients with diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(1):CD002187.
  102. Cabello Benavente R, Moncada Iribarren I, de Palacio Espana A, et al. Transdermal iontophoresis with dexamethasone and verapamil for Peyronie's disease. Actas Urol Esp. 2005;29(10):955-960.
  103. Dall'era JE, Mills JN, Koul HK, Meacham RB. Penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy: Important therapy or wishful thinking? Rev Urol. 2006;8(4):209-215.
  104. Sasso F, Gulino G, Falabella R, et al. Peyronie's disease: Lights and shadows. Urol Int. 2007;78(1):1-9.
  105. Akin-Olugbade Y, Mulhall JP. The medical management of Peyronie's disease. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2007;4(2):95-103.
  106. Greenfield JM, Shah SJ, Levine LA. Verapamil versus saline in electromotive drug administration for Peyronie's disease: A double-blind, placebo controlled trial. J Urol. 2007;177(3):972-975.
  107. Miles CL, Candy B, Jones L, et al. Interventions for sexual dysfunction following treatments for cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(4):CD005540.
  108. Tharyan P, Gopalakrishanan G. Erectile dysfunction. In: BMJ Clinical Evidence. London, UK: BMJ Publishing Group; August 2005.
  109. Shafik A, Shafik AA, Shafik IA, El Sibai O. Percutaneous perineal electrostimulation induces erection: Clinical significance in patients with spinal cord injury and erectile dysfunction. J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31(1):40-43.
  110. Qaseem A, Snow V, Denberg TD, et al; Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee of the American College of Physicians. Hormonal testing and pharmacologic treatment of erectile dysfunction: A clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(9):639-649.
  111. Tsertsvadze A, Fink HA, Yazdi F, et al. Oral phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and hormonal treatments for erectile dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(9):650-661.
  112. Babaei AR, Safarinejad MR, Kolahi AA. Penile revascularization for erectile dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications. Urol J. 2009;6(1):1-7.
  113. Lee MS, Shin BC, Ernst E. Acupuncture for treating erectile dysfunction: A systematic review. BJU Int. 2009;104(3):366-370.
  114. Lin G, Banie L, Ning H, et al. Potential of adipose-derived stem cells for treatment of erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2009;6 Suppl 3:320-327.
  115. Heidelbaugh JJ. Management of erectile dysfunction. Am Fam Physician. 2010;81(3):305-312.
  116. Hellstrom WJ, Montague DK, Moncada I, et al. Implants, mechanical devices, and vascular surgery for erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2010;7(1 Pt 2):501-523.
  117. Hilz MJ, Marthol H. Erectile dysfunction -- value of neurophysiologic diagnostic procedures. Urologe A. 2003;42(10):1345-1350.
  118. Hamdan FB, Al-Matubsi HY. Assessment of erectile dysfunction in diabetic patients. Int J Androl. 2009;32(2):176-185.
  119. Shirazi M, Haghpanah AR, Badiee M, et al. Effect of intralesional verapamil for treatment of Peyronie's disease: A randomized single-blind, placebo-controlled study. Int Urol Nephrol. 2009;41(3):467-471.
  120. Heidari M, Nejadi JR, Ghate A, et al. Evaluation of intralesional injection of verapamil in treatment of Peyronie's disease. J Pak Med Assoc. 2010;60(4):291-293.
  121. Lin CS, Xin ZC, Wang Z, et al. Stem cell therapy for erectile dysfunction: A critical review. Stem Cells Dev. 2012;21(3):343-351.
  122. Gruenwald I, Appel B, Vardi Y. et al. Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy -- a novel effective treatment for erectile dysfunction in severe ED patients who respond poorly to PDE5 inhibitor therapy. J Sex Med. 2012;9(1):259-264.
  123. Zhang T, Li WL, He XF, et al. The insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism in the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene and erectile dysfunction risk: A meta-analysis. Andrology. 2013;1(2):274-280.
  124. Xu J, Huang P, Song B, Chen JM. Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on erectile dysfunction in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: A meta-analysis. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2013;19(1):77-81.
  125. Jordan GH. The use of intralesional clostridial collagenase injection therapy for Peyronie's disease: A prospective, single-center, non-placebo-controlled study. J Sex Med. 2008;5(1):180-187.
  126. Gelbard M, Lipshultz LI, Tursi J, et al. Phase 2b study of the clinical efficacy and safety of collagenase Clostridium histolyticum in patients with Peyronie disease. J Urol. 2012;187(6):2268-2274.
  127. Gelbard M, Goldstein I, Hellstrom WJ, et al. Clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of collagenase clostridium histolyticum for the treatment of peyronie disease in 2 large double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase 3 studies. J Urol. 2013;190(1):199-207.
  128. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). FDA approves first drug treatment for Peyronie’s disease. FDA News. Silver Spring, MD: FDA; December 6, 2013.  Available at: http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm377849.htm?source=govdelivery&utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery. Accessed December 9, 2013.


email this page   


Copyright Aetna Inc. All rights reserved. Clinical Policy Bulletins are developed by Aetna to assist in administering plan benefits and constitute neither offers of coverage nor medical advice. This Clinical Policy Bulletin contains only a partial, general description of plan or program benefits and does not constitute a contract. Aetna does not provide health care services and, therefore, cannot guarantee any results or outcomes. Participating providers are independent contractors in private practice and are neither employees nor agents of Aetna or its affiliates. Treating providers are solely responsible for medical advice and treatment of members. This Clinical Policy Bulletin may be updated and therefore is subject to change.
Aetna
Back to top