Public Policy Perspectives Business Solutions Aetna PAC Aetna on the Issues Legal Highlights
Company Information
 
Aetna On The Issues
Public Policy Perspectives Business Solutions Aetna PAC Index Of Quarterly Features
Aetna
Shortcuts
Aetna Aetna
Aetna On The Issues
Aetna's position on the public policy issues of the day
Summer 2008 Feature:
The Colvin Interview: "We all pay for the uninsured." Optimistic but practical, Aetna CEO Ron Williams defends the U.S. health insurance industry

The following appeared in the May 12, 2008 edition of Fortune. Used with permission.

Public Policy Perspectives
Our Issues at a Glance provide an overview of pressing public policy issues, the answers to commonly asked questions and a summary of how Aetna is making a difference.
more
 
Business Solutions
Read about Aetna's focus on developing innovative products and services to help address many of the challenges confronting health care consumers.
more
 
Aetna PAC
Learn how Aetna's political action committee (PAC) is working in the political arena to help effect public policy solutions.
more
 
Index of Quarterly Features
Read articles featured in previous editions of Aetna on the Issues.
more
Aetna
 Ronald A. Williams

Ronald A. Williams

VOTERS ARE MORE WORRIED about health care than about Iraq, according to recent polls, making it a key political issue—and leading many health insurance company CEOs to keep their heads down. Aetna's Ron Williams has been an exception, speaking up on many major issues, though declining to endorse any candidate's health-care proposal. Formerly Blue Cross of California's president, Williams came to Aetna as COO in 2001 when the company was on the brink of failure. He and CEO Jack Rowe engineered a turnaround that increased the company's value from $3 billion then to $21 billion today. Williams succeeded Rowe as CEO in 2006. Before an audience in the Time & Life Building in Manhattan, Williams sat down with Fortune's Geoff Colvin. Edited excerpts:


In most industries rising revenues are regarded as good. Why is it that in health care, rising revenues are regarded as a grave national problem?
I think the U.S. is conflicted. When it comes to our own health care, we all want the best—access to the latest and most important technology. At the same time, health care is typically purchased in an institutional setting. So we purchase it in the aggregate, but we consume it as individuals. Today the U.S. spends about $2.2 trillion a year on health care. As an industry we have to do a better job of describing how we help people get access to the health care they need and improve the quality of care they're given, and how that $2.2 trillion could easily have been $2.4 trillion.

Why does the U.S. spend so much more per capita than any other country?
We are a wealthy country. We also are the global engine of innovation in health care, whether it's the pharmaceutical industry or the creation of medical devices. Our health-care delivery system is different from many others in that we have a smaller group of primary-care or family-practice physicians and a much larger base of specialists. There's at least one economist who argues that the increase in health-care costs has actually been a positive in the context of productivity in health in the U.S. So in a lot of ways we're getting what we want, which is more health care, more access, and more technology.

  Full Story  (4 pages)

email this page   
medium small large
Aetna
Aetna